Modelling federated learning workflows for the cloud-to-edge continuum

Federated Learning (FL) is a key paradigm for distributed, data rich environments, leveraging devices across the Cloud-to-Edge continuum to minimise latency and bandwidth usage while preserving privacy. However, testing these systems (IoT, 5G/6G) with FL capabilities in physical testbeds is challenging due to high costs and complexity, making simulation tools essential. In this paper, we introduce a simulation framework for modelling FL workflows in Cloud-to-Edge scenarios. Implemented as an extension to the DISSECT-CF-Fog discrete-event simulator, our module reuses its workflow scheduling and execution functionalities to model FL processes with centralised orchestration, diverse network topologies, varying device capacities, and dynamic workloads. It abstracts low-level Machine Learning mechanics to focus on first-order system effects such as latency, network traffic, and energy use. We model a Holographic Type Communications (HTC) use case as a baseline scenario (S0) to orchestrate FL deployments and quantify trade-offs in round latency, traffic, and energy across four operational scenarios: scalability (S1), aggregation policies (S2), pacing strategies (S3), and privacy and compression (S4). Each scenario tracks a synthetic learning progress proxy (e.g., rising from ≈ 0.50 to > 0.9 over 20 rounds in S0) and per-round aggregator energy (e.g., ≈ 1 kJ for early aggregation to ≈ 10 kJ for timeout rounds in S0). Ultimately, the module exposes how operational variations shape system costs. For example, aggressive model compression (e.g., 0.2 × in S4) reduces per-round traffic proportionally, yet the corresponding energy saving is bounded by fixed per-round infrastructure costs that dominate when rounds close on a timeout rather than on transmission completion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2026.103333
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling federated learning workflows for the cloud-to-edge continuum

Dimitra Simeonidou, Attila Kertész, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Wilson Valdez
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Modelling federated learning workflows for the cloud-to-edge continuum

Dimitra Simeonidou, Attila Kertész, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Wilson Valdez
article en

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a key paradigm for distributed, data rich environments, leveraging devices across the Cloud-to-Edge continuum to minimise latency and bandwidth usage while preserving privacy. However, testing these systems (IoT, 5G/6G) with FL capabilities in physical testbeds is challenging due to high costs and complexity, making simulation tools essential. In this paper, we introduce a simulation framework for modelling FL workflows in Cloud-to-Edge scenarios. Implemented as an extension to the DISSECT-CF-Fog discrete-event simulator, our module reuses its workflow scheduling and execution functionalities to model FL processes with centralised orchestration, diverse network topologies, varying device capacities, and dynamic workloads. It abstracts low-level Machine Learning mechanics to focus on first-order system effects such as latency, network traffic, and energy use. We model a Holographic Type Communications (HTC) use case as a baseline scenario (S0) to orchestrate FL deployments and quantify trade-offs in round latency, traffic, and energy across four operational scenarios: scalability (S1), aggregation policies (S2), pacing strategies (S3), and privacy and compression (S4). Each scenario tracks a synthetic learning progress proxy (e.g., rising from ≈ 0.50 to > 0.9 over 20 rounds in S0) and per-round aggregator energy (e.g., ≈ 1 kJ for early aggregation to ≈ 10 kJ for timeout rounds in S0). Ultimately, the module exposes how operational variations shape system costs. For example, aggressive model compression (e.g., 0.2 × in S4) reduces per-round traffic proportionally, yet the corresponding energy saving is bounded by fixed per-round infrastructure costs that dominate when rounds close on a timeout rather than on transmission completion.

Simulation Modelling Practice and TheoryVol. 152
BT Group (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Szeged (HU), University of Bristol (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.