Diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET in comparison to [18F]FDG PET in triple-negative breast cancer and potential for theranostic application

Abstract This single-center subgroup analysis of a prospective trial (NCT04571086) at University Hospital Essen investigated tumor uptake and detection rates of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46- versus [ 18 F]FDG PET in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing initial or follow-up staging. Lesions were recorded across anatomical regions, with detection efficacy, uptake values, tumor-to-liver ratios, and tumor volumes assessed. 22 patients were included (initial- n = 10, follow-up staging n = 12). No significant difference in region-based detection rates was observed between [ 18 F]FDG- (93%, 53/57 regions) and [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET (93%, 53/57 regions) (McNemar p = 1.0). Three patients (25%) at follow-up staging showed an average tumor SUV mean ≥5 on [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET; 2/3 showed SUV max >10 in most lesions. Mean tumor volume was higher for [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, though not statistically significant at initial- (50.1 ± 120.8 mL vs. 11.9 ± 18.5 mL) and follow-up staging (102.2 ± 122.3 mL vs. 79.0 ± 90.4 mL). [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET demonstrated comparable detection in TNBC; high tumor uptake in a subset, supporting its theranostic potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-61253-8
Primary Topic
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET in comparison to [18F]FDG PET in triple-negative breast cancer and potential for theranostic application

Sofia C. Vaz, Ken Herrmann, Anja Welt, David Kersting et al.
Scientific Reports
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
article

Diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET in comparison to [18F]FDG PET in triple-negative breast cancer and potential for theranostic application

Sofia C. Vaz, Ken Herrmann, Anja Welt, David Kersting, Lale Umutlu, Kim M. Pabst, Ilektra Antonia Mavroeidi, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Alexandros Moraitis, Rainer Hamacher, Loïc Djaileb, Martin Schuler, Tristan Demmert, Alina Toni Küper, Sherko Kümmel, Robert Seifert, Ieva Ciuciulkaite
article en

Abstract

Abstract This single-center subgroup analysis of a prospective trial (NCT04571086) at University Hospital Essen investigated tumor uptake and detection rates of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46- versus [ 18 F]FDG PET in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing initial or follow-up staging. Lesions were recorded across anatomical regions, with detection efficacy, uptake values, tumor-to-liver ratios, and tumor volumes assessed. 22 patients were included (initial- n = 10, follow-up staging n = 12). No significant difference in region-based detection rates was observed between [ 18 F]FDG- (93%, 53/57 regions) and [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET (93%, 53/57 regions) (McNemar p = 1.0). Three patients (25%) at follow-up staging showed an average tumor SUV mean ≥5 on [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET; 2/3 showed SUV max >10 in most lesions. Mean tumor volume was higher for [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, though not statistically significant at initial- (50.1 ± 120.8 mL vs. 11.9 ± 18.5 mL) and follow-up staging (102.2 ± 122.3 mL vs. 79.0 ± 90.4 mL). [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET demonstrated comparable detection in TNBC; high tumor uptake in a subset, supporting its theranostic potential.

Scientific Reports
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), University of Bern (CH), Inserm (FR), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), University Hospital of Bern (CH), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Prostate Cancer Foundation, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.