Activating resilience: how persistent adversity drives entrepreneurial team adaptation

Purpose This study examines how entrepreneurial team resilience develops amid persistent adversity, focusing on mechanisms through which teams move between resilience states as the novelty, disruption and criticality of adversity change over time. Design/methodology/approach Guided by event system theory (EST), we conducted a qualitative study based on 62 retrospective interviews with members of 39 entrepreneurial teams in China. Respondents reconstructed their experiences across multiple phases of the three-year COVID-19 pandemic, enabling us to examine how resilience changed over time. Findings We find that resilience develops through a sequence of state transitions as the attributes of adversity change, with each transition linked to a distinct mechanism. From a latent state, high novelty and disruption prompt improvisational adaptation, leading to foundational resilience. Sustained disruption and rising criticality trigger relational and cognitive integration, which consolidates resilience. When adversity becomes highly critical, teams rely on shared vision to sustain commitment and redirect collective action (meaning-based adaptation). As adversity subsides, teams embed and recalibrate these capacities into a stronger latent resilience capacity than before the crisis. Originality/value This study explains how changes in the attributes of adversity prompt mechanisms that drive teams through successive resilience states. The process model highlights the transformed latent state, through which teams rebuild latent capacity at a higher level. We reframe team resilience as a cumulative, path-dependent process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-11-2025-1727
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Activating resilience: how persistent adversity drives entrepreneurial team adaptation

Jian Liu, Haibo Zhou, Rainer Harms, Petra de Weerd-Nederhof
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Activating resilience: how persistent adversity drives entrepreneurial team adaptation

Jian Liu, Haibo Zhou, Rainer Harms, Petra de Weerd-Nederhof
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how entrepreneurial team resilience develops amid persistent adversity, focusing on mechanisms through which teams move between resilience states as the novelty, disruption and criticality of adversity change over time. Design/methodology/approach Guided by event system theory (EST), we conducted a qualitative study based on 62 retrospective interviews with members of 39 entrepreneurial teams in China. Respondents reconstructed their experiences across multiple phases of the three-year COVID-19 pandemic, enabling us to examine how resilience changed over time. Findings We find that resilience develops through a sequence of state transitions as the attributes of adversity change, with each transition linked to a distinct mechanism. From a latent state, high novelty and disruption prompt improvisational adaptation, leading to foundational resilience. Sustained disruption and rising criticality trigger relational and cognitive integration, which consolidates resilience. When adversity becomes highly critical, teams rely on shared vision to sustain commitment and redirect collective action (meaning-based adaptation). As adversity subsides, teams embed and recalibrate these capacities into a stronger latent resilience capacity than before the crisis. Originality/value This study explains how changes in the attributes of adversity prompt mechanisms that drive teams through successive resilience states. The process model highlights the transformed latent state, through which teams rebuild latent capacity at a higher level. We reframe team resilience as a cumulative, path-dependent process.

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), University of Nottingham (GB), Wittenborg University (NL), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.