Immediate and Delayed Recall of Simulated L2 Motor Vehicle Accident Details

Litigation efforts commonly rely on testimony from eyewitnesses and involved parties, often using responses collected weeks to years after the incident. However, delaying memory recall is generally associated with reduced completeness and increased variability in reported information. This study examined immediate and delayed recall of details among 28 licensed drivers who participated in a virtual reality driving simulation involving an imminent head-on sideswipe collision while supervising an SAE Level 2 driving automation system. Participants provided event reports immediately following the simulation, and again at a 2-month follow-up. Results indicated a decline in recall accuracy over time for vehicle speeds and their evasive performance. Participants consistently overestimated time-to-collision. Trial duration estimates were significantly underestimated during immediate recall and did not differ significantly during follow-up. Overall, these findings suggest that immediate reports were more accurate than delayed reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261475185
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immediate and Delayed Recall of Simulated L2 Motor Vehicle Accident Details

Todd Roescher, Kim‐Phuong L. Vu, Maegan Schmitz, Anushka Brito
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Immediate and Delayed Recall of Simulated L2 Motor Vehicle Accident Details

Todd Roescher, Kim‐Phuong L. Vu, Maegan Schmitz, Anushka Brito
article en

Abstract

Litigation efforts commonly rely on testimony from eyewitnesses and involved parties, often using responses collected weeks to years after the incident. However, delaying memory recall is generally associated with reduced completeness and increased variability in reported information. This study examined immediate and delayed recall of details among 28 licensed drivers who participated in a virtual reality driving simulation involving an imminent head-on sideswipe collision while supervising an SAE Level 2 driving automation system. Participants provided event reports immediately following the simulation, and again at a 2-month follow-up. Results indicated a decline in recall accuracy over time for vehicle speeds and their evasive performance. Participants consistently overestimated time-to-collision. Trial duration estimates were significantly underestimated during immediate recall and did not differ significantly during follow-up. Overall, these findings suggest that immediate reports were more accurate than delayed reports.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
American University of Health Sciences (US), California State University, Long Beach (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.