Cancer Therapy-Related Cutaneous Toxicities: Prognostic Biomarkers, Immunologic Endotypes, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) are among the most common toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, treatment adherence, and therapeutic outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms, clinical manifestations, prognostic implications, and management strategies of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities, with a particular focus on precision oncodermatology. Methods: A narrative review of the recent literature was performed, integrating evidence from clinical studies, meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance investigations, consensus guidelines, and translational research. The review examines cutaneous toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, antibody–drug conjugates, and other emerging anticancer treatments. Results: Four major axes were identified: immune disinhibition, epithelial signaling inhibition, cytotoxic epithelial injury, and cytokine-driven immune activation. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) emerged as potential biomarkers of treatment efficacy, particularly vitiligo, lichenoid, and psoriasiform eruptions. Increasing evidence supports the use of steroid-sparing biologic therapies, including dupilumab, omalizumab, anti-IL-17 agents, and Janus kinase inhibitors, although prospective validation remains limited. Recent advances in immunologic endotyping have identified distinct inflammatory pathways that may enable personalized therapeutic approaches. Antibody–drug conjugates represent an expanding source of unique dermatologic toxicities requiring dedicated management strategies. Emerging biomarkers, including cytokine signatures and microRNAs, may further refine risk stratification and treatment selection. Conclusions: The management of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities is evolving toward a precision medicine model integrating clinical phenotype, immunologic endotype, and biomarker profiling. Early multidisciplinary intervention and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies may improve patient outcomes while preserving anticancer efficacy. Prospective studies are needed to validate biomarker-guided and steroid-sparing approaches in oncodermatology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Onco
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/onco6030039
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer Therapy-Related Cutaneous Toxicities: Prognostic Biomarkers, Immunologic Endotypes, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Federico Venturi, Emi Dika
Onco
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Cancer Therapy-Related Cutaneous Toxicities: Prognostic Biomarkers, Immunologic Endotypes, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Federico Venturi, Emi Dika
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) are among the most common toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, treatment adherence, and therapeutic outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms, clinical manifestations, prognostic implications, and management strategies of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities, with a particular focus on precision oncodermatology. Methods: A narrative review of the recent literature was performed, integrating evidence from clinical studies, meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance investigations, consensus guidelines, and translational research. The review examines cutaneous toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, antibody–drug conjugates, and other emerging anticancer treatments. Results: Four major axes were identified: immune disinhibition, epithelial signaling inhibition, cytotoxic epithelial injury, and cytokine-driven immune activation. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) emerged as potential biomarkers of treatment efficacy, particularly vitiligo, lichenoid, and psoriasiform eruptions. Increasing evidence supports the use of steroid-sparing biologic therapies, including dupilumab, omalizumab, anti-IL-17 agents, and Janus kinase inhibitors, although prospective validation remains limited. Recent advances in immunologic endotyping have identified distinct inflammatory pathways that may enable personalized therapeutic approaches. Antibody–drug conjugates represent an expanding source of unique dermatologic toxicities requiring dedicated management strategies. Emerging biomarkers, including cytokine signatures and microRNAs, may further refine risk stratification and treatment selection. Conclusions: The management of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities is evolving toward a precision medicine model integrating clinical phenotype, immunologic endotype, and biomarker profiling. Early multidisciplinary intervention and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies may improve patient outcomes while preserving anticancer efficacy. Prospective studies are needed to validate biomarker-guided and steroid-sparing approaches in oncodermatology.

OncoVol. 6(3)
Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.