Design of a Materials Testing 2.0 Creep Test Using the Virtual Fields Method and Open Source Tools

Abstract Background Traditional creep testing takes thousands of hours and incurs large costs. Calibrating constitutive models for creep offers the potential to perform shorter tests and extrapolate to longer durations. Objective This work focuses on the design of a complex specimen geometry, suitable for a Materials Testing 2.0 (MT2) style creep test, that uses a heterogeneous stress field and inverse identification to determine constitutive model parameters. Methods A digital toolchain comprising of finite element simulation, image deformation, 2D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and inverse identification has been used to assess candidate geometries. The open source material modelling code New Engineering Material model Library 2 (NEML2) has been used to create a GPU-accelerated Virtual Fields Method (VFM) for inverse identification. Results Promising specimen geometries have been identified from a grid search of a simple two variable geometry parameterisation. Investigations of the design space suggest that wide stress ranges and high constitutive model parameter sensitivities drive accurate creep constitutive model identification. However, the maximum achievable stress range and sensitivity is limited by the ability of the DIC system to resolve the strain field. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of including DIC within the design loop for MT2 tests to generate realistic and measurable specimen designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Mechanics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-026-01360-9
Primary Topic
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design of a Materials Testing 2.0 Creep Test Using the Virtual Fields Method and Open Source Tools

Rory Spencer, R. Hamill, L. Fletcher, C. Hamelin et al.
Experimental Mechanics
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
article

Design of a Materials Testing 2.0 Creep Test Using the Virtual Fields Method and Open Source Tools

Rory Spencer, R. Hamill, L. Fletcher, C. Hamelin, A. Harte
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Traditional creep testing takes thousands of hours and incurs large costs. Calibrating constitutive models for creep offers the potential to perform shorter tests and extrapolate to longer durations. Objective This work focuses on the design of a complex specimen geometry, suitable for a Materials Testing 2.0 (MT2) style creep test, that uses a heterogeneous stress field and inverse identification to determine constitutive model parameters. Methods A digital toolchain comprising of finite element simulation, image deformation, 2D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and inverse identification has been used to assess candidate geometries. The open source material modelling code New Engineering Material model Library 2 (NEML2) has been used to create a GPU-accelerated Virtual Fields Method (VFM) for inverse identification. Results Promising specimen geometries have been identified from a grid search of a simple two variable geometry parameterisation. Investigations of the design space suggest that wide stress ranges and high constitutive model parameter sensitivities drive accurate creep constitutive model identification. However, the maximum achievable stress range and sensitivity is limited by the ability of the DIC system to resolve the strain field. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of including DIC within the design loop for MT2 tests to generate realistic and measurable specimen designs.

Experimental Mechanics
Culham Science Centre (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Euratom Research and Training Programme, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.