Leadership for innovation: Teacher participation in decision-making, readiness for change, and collective teacher efficacy

Schools are increasingly confronted with complex and evolving demands, requiring continuous organizational and instructional improvement. School leaders are in a pivotal position to design and initiate school improvement initiatives. Effective school improvement depends on change processes at both the organizational and individual teacher levels, yet few studies have addressed this interplay—especially from a longitudinal perspective. Drawing on theoretical frameworks at both levels, this study examines how principals involve teachers in school-level decision-making and how this is associated with teachers’ perceptions of organizational readiness for change and collective teacher efficacy. Based on panel data from three measurement points over 2.5 years ( T 1 : 619; T 2 : 674; T 3 : 263) collected from teachers in Germany, we find that while teachers report generally high levels of participation, relatively few are involved in concrete aspects of school improvement. Higher levels of participation are associated with increases in teachers’ perceptions of organizational readiness for change and collective teacher efficacy over time. These findings underscore the importance of leadership practices that meaningfully engage teachers in school improvement and suggest that principals need the skills to involve teachers appropriately, while school administration must ensure the structural conditions that allow teachers to act on their motivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261470556
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership for innovation: Teacher participation in decision-making, readiness for change, and collective teacher efficacy

Sebastian Kempert, Peng Liu, André Meyer, Dirk Richter
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Leadership for innovation: Teacher participation in decision-making, readiness for change, and collective teacher efficacy

Sebastian Kempert, Peng Liu, André Meyer, Dirk Richter
article en

Abstract

Schools are increasingly confronted with complex and evolving demands, requiring continuous organizational and instructional improvement. School leaders are in a pivotal position to design and initiate school improvement initiatives. Effective school improvement depends on change processes at both the organizational and individual teacher levels, yet few studies have addressed this interplay—especially from a longitudinal perspective. Drawing on theoretical frameworks at both levels, this study examines how principals involve teachers in school-level decision-making and how this is associated with teachers’ perceptions of organizational readiness for change and collective teacher efficacy. Based on panel data from three measurement points over 2.5 years ( T 1 : 619; T 2 : 674; T 3 : 263) collected from teachers in Germany, we find that while teachers report generally high levels of participation, relatively few are involved in concrete aspects of school improvement. Higher levels of participation are associated with increases in teachers’ perceptions of organizational readiness for change and collective teacher efficacy over time. These findings underscore the importance of leadership practices that meaningfully engage teachers in school improvement and suggest that principals need the skills to involve teachers appropriately, while school administration must ensure the structural conditions that allow teachers to act on their motivation.

Educational Management Administration & Leadership
University of Potsdam (DE), University of Manitoba (CA)
Robert Bosch Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.