Application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of health assessment course: a quasi-experimental study

Abstract Objective This study aimed to explore the effects of the modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) combined with the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) model in the experimental teaching of Health Assessment course. Background The Mini-cex and the SBAR model are widely used in clinical nursing to improve nurses’ operational skills and general competence. However, there is a lack of evidence to indicate that their combination can produce a synergistic effect on undergraduates’ multiple abilities, such as autonomous learning and critical thinking. Design Quasi-experimental. Methods This study included 311 nursing students in two parallel classes at a nursing college and divided them into an intervention group (155 students) and a control group (156 students). In the intervention group, an modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR teaching method was adopted, and the teaching process included classroom scenario simulation and clinical apprenticeship. In the control group, conventional teaching methods were used. At the end of the course, the 2 groups of students were compared in terms of independent learning ability, critical thinking ability, nurse empathy, attitude toward communication skills, and course achievement. Results After intervention, the total independent learning ability score(110.20±6.37 vs. 98.79±7.57), the total critical thinking ability score(295.43±15.34 vs. 272.52±13.85), the total empathy ability score(93.08±7.61 vs. 86.22±6.82), the positive scores of students' attitudes toward communication skills score(50.35±3.95 vs. 46.58±4.27), and the clinical skills assessment score(78.83±8.81 vs. 74.82±9.41) of the students in the intervention group were significantly higher than those of control group, and with a statistically significant difference ( p <0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the total theoretical examination score ( p >0.05). Conclusion The application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of Health Assessment course had a positive effect on students, which can improve students' clinical practice abilities and comprehensive clinical quality. The model can be further promoted in the future to improve the quality of teaching and students' professional abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10086-0
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of health assessment course: a quasi-experimental study

Miao Yu, Le Wang, Ning Liu, Wang Miao et al.
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of health assessment course: a quasi-experimental study

Miao Yu, Le Wang, Ning Liu, Wang Miao, Shenglin Chen, Hui-xue Wang, Feng-ling Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to explore the effects of the modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) combined with the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) model in the experimental teaching of Health Assessment course. Background The Mini-cex and the SBAR model are widely used in clinical nursing to improve nurses’ operational skills and general competence. However, there is a lack of evidence to indicate that their combination can produce a synergistic effect on undergraduates’ multiple abilities, such as autonomous learning and critical thinking. Design Quasi-experimental. Methods This study included 311 nursing students in two parallel classes at a nursing college and divided them into an intervention group (155 students) and a control group (156 students). In the intervention group, an modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR teaching method was adopted, and the teaching process included classroom scenario simulation and clinical apprenticeship. In the control group, conventional teaching methods were used. At the end of the course, the 2 groups of students were compared in terms of independent learning ability, critical thinking ability, nurse empathy, attitude toward communication skills, and course achievement. Results After intervention, the total independent learning ability score(110.20±6.37 vs. 98.79±7.57), the total critical thinking ability score(295.43±15.34 vs. 272.52±13.85), the total empathy ability score(93.08±7.61 vs. 86.22±6.82), the positive scores of students' attitudes toward communication skills score(50.35±3.95 vs. 46.58±4.27), and the clinical skills assessment score(78.83±8.81 vs. 74.82±9.41) of the students in the intervention group were significantly higher than those of control group, and with a statistically significant difference ( p <0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the total theoretical examination score ( p >0.05). Conclusion The application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of Health Assessment course had a positive effect on students, which can improve students' clinical practice abilities and comprehensive clinical quality. The model can be further promoted in the future to improve the quality of teaching and students' professional abilities.

BMC Medical Education
Wannan Medical College (CN), Wuhu Fourth People Hospital (CN), Wuhu No 1 People's Hospital (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.