Oral Anticoagulation Registry in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated in Primary Care in Clinical Practice: The RACOVIR Study

Abstract Objectives To assess how patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving oral anticoagulants are managed in routine primary care practice in Spain. Methods This observational, descriptive study included patients with NVAF treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 6 months before enrolment and managed in primary care settings in Spain. The Barthel and ACTS questionnaires were administered to evaluate functional autonomy and treatment satisfaction, respectively. Results A total of 1,901 patients were included: 428 received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and 1,473 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, those treated with VKAs were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension. Mean treatment duration was 7.6 years for VKAs and 3.8 years for DOACs. Among patients receiving VKAs, 56.2% and 59.0% achieved good anticoagulation control according to the direct and Rosendaal methods, respectively. Patients in the DOAC group reported greater satisfaction across several domains, including perceived treatment benefits, lower impact on daily life, and overall positive treatment effect. Event incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) were higher with DOACs than with VKAs for stroke (1.75; 95% CI 1.05-2.92), ischemic stroke (1.78; 95% CI 1.06-3.00), acute myocardial infarction (1.64; 95% CI 0.97-2.79), and major bleeding (3.68; 95% CI 1.81-7.46). Conclusions In routine primary care practice in Spain, patient profiles and treatment duration varied by oral anticoagulant type. These differences may partly explain the higher rates of stroke and major bleeding observed with DOACs versus VKAs, despite greater treatment satisfaction among patients receiving DOACs.