The Past, Present, and Future of Online Biodiversity Knowledge Systems

In recent decades, the availability and accessibility of biodiversity data and the profusion of portals, tools, and platforms through which to utilize them have increased rapidly. This reflects the extensive variety of challenges biodiversity data are being used to address and the need to enhance decision-making by different stakeholder groups. Although this has provided unprecedented opportunities for those outside mainstream academia to contribute to and benefit from these resources, it can create confusion in navigating biodiversity data within a highly saturated landscape. We present a new database of 698 global, more than 200 regional, and at least 1,400 national web-based data systems. We then apply both a newly developed typology for online biodiversity data systems and the DPSR+B (drivers, pressure, state, response, benefits) framework to categorize them. We also consider whether target groups are well-defined for these systems. Our analysis shows delivery gaps in systems and data for nature's benefits, agricultural- and wildlife-related supply chains, and specific pressures such as illegal and unsustainable use. Moreover, users’ inability to find the right systems, or interpret them accurately, may lead to poorer conservation outcomes. We make recommendations regarding next-generation online systems that reduce redundancy, lower costs, and improve delivery of information for decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121224-084200
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Past, Present, and Future of Online Biodiversity Knowledge Systems

Heli Sihvonen, Nina Bhola, Nazlı Demirel, Arnout van Soesbergen et al.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

The Past, Present, and Future of Online Biodiversity Knowledge Systems

Heli Sihvonen, Nina Bhola, Nazlı Demirel, Arnout van Soesbergen, C. Taylor, P.J. Stephenson, Lera Miles, Antonella Arcangeli, Osgur McDermott Long, Alena Cierna, Ayesha Hargey, Neil D. Burgess, M. Eugenia Degano, Charlie Taylor, Vincent Blanqué, Zuhail Thatey, Alice hughes, Yanina Sica, Falko Buschke, Hilary Kemp, Felix Yi Kui Tin, Lauren Weatherdon
article en

Abstract

In recent decades, the availability and accessibility of biodiversity data and the profusion of portals, tools, and platforms through which to utilize them have increased rapidly. This reflects the extensive variety of challenges biodiversity data are being used to address and the need to enhance decision-making by different stakeholder groups. Although this has provided unprecedented opportunities for those outside mainstream academia to contribute to and benefit from these resources, it can create confusion in navigating biodiversity data within a highly saturated landscape. We present a new database of 698 global, more than 200 regional, and at least 1,400 national web-based data systems. We then apply both a newly developed typology for online biodiversity data systems and the DPSR+B (drivers, pressure, state, response, benefits) framework to categorize them. We also consider whether target groups are well-defined for these systems. Our analysis shows delivery gaps in systems and data for nature's benefits, agricultural- and wildlife-related supply chains, and specific pressures such as illegal and unsustainable use. Moreover, users’ inability to find the right systems, or interpret them accurately, may lead to poorer conservation outcomes. We make recommendations regarding next-generation online systems that reduce redundancy, lower costs, and improve delivery of information for decision-making.

Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Copenhagen (DK), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Joint Research Centre (IT), Future Earth (CA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH), 21c Consultancy (United Kingdom) (GB), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.