Impact of intraoperative CT on implant accuracy and reoperation rates in orbital floor reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Implant malposition is a leading cause of reoperation after orbital floor reconstruction. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) enables immediate assessment and correction, however its impact on implant positioning accuracy and outcomes remains insufficiently studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients with isolated orbital floor fractures treated with radiopaque implants between 2011 and 2023 at Uppsala University Hospital. Sixty-five patients underwent postoperative CT and 21 intraoperative CT. Eight senior surgeons from all Swedish university hospitals independently reviewed anonymized scans under hypothetical intraoperative and postoperative conditions, indicating whether they would adjust the implant intraoperatively or recommend reoperation postoperatively. In the intraoperative group, implant position was assessed on final CT obtained after any CT-guided adjustment. Actual re-intervention rates were recorded. RESULTS: Recommendations for implant adjustment were significantly more frequent in the postoperative CT group than in the intraoperative CT group (45% vs. 19%, p = 0.042). Unanimous agreement that no adjustment was required occurred more often in the intraoperative CT group (48% vs. 22%). Consensus among ≥3 experts favoring reoperation was observed in 20% of postoperative cases and in none of the intraoperative cases. The perceived need for reoperation was lower in the intraoperative than in the postoperative CT group (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.45), as were actual reoperation rates (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CT was associated with improved expert-assessed implant positioning. Although reoperation rates were lower in the intraoperative CT group, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.46475
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of intraoperative CT on implant accuracy and reoperation rates in orbital floor reconstruction

Babak Alinasab, Ulf Höckerfelt, Andreas Thor, Anders Johansson et al.
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Impact of intraoperative CT on implant accuracy and reoperation rates in orbital floor reconstruction

Babak Alinasab, Ulf Höckerfelt, Andreas Thor, Anders Johansson, Konstantinos Roussos, Eva Larsson, Nikoo Bazsefidpay, A Erik G Persson, Anders Arbrandt, Daniel Nowinski
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant malposition is a leading cause of reoperation after orbital floor reconstruction. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) enables immediate assessment and correction, however its impact on implant positioning accuracy and outcomes remains insufficiently studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients with isolated orbital floor fractures treated with radiopaque implants between 2011 and 2023 at Uppsala University Hospital. Sixty-five patients underwent postoperative CT and 21 intraoperative CT. Eight senior surgeons from all Swedish university hospitals independently reviewed anonymized scans under hypothetical intraoperative and postoperative conditions, indicating whether they would adjust the implant intraoperatively or recommend reoperation postoperatively. In the intraoperative group, implant position was assessed on final CT obtained after any CT-guided adjustment. Actual re-intervention rates were recorded. RESULTS: Recommendations for implant adjustment were significantly more frequent in the postoperative CT group than in the intraoperative CT group (45% vs. 19%, p = 0.042). Unanimous agreement that no adjustment was required occurred more often in the intraoperative CT group (48% vs. 22%). Consensus among ≥3 experts favoring reoperation was observed in 20% of postoperative cases and in none of the intraoperative cases. The perceived need for reoperation was lower in the intraoperative than in the postoperative CT group (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.45), as were actual reoperation rates (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CT was associated with improved expert-assessed implant positioning. Although reoperation rates were lower in the intraoperative CT group, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand SurgeryVol. 61
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Örebro University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Örebro University Hospital (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala Universitet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.