Flexible firewalls: selective cooperation and strategic demarcation between centre-right and far-right parties in the EU

The success of far-right parties across Europe has sparked debate about whether centre-right parties maintain or abandon the cordon sanitaire against the far right. Moving beyond this binary, we conceptualise centre-right strategy in European Union politics as ‘flexible firewalls’, encompassing not only selective cooperation but also strategic demarcation. We develop an original explanatory framework accounting for this variation, based on two factors: issue-type and party acceptability. Divergent vote- and policy-seeking incentives explain why centre-right parties increasingly cooperate with far-right parties on policy issues (i.e., economic and social regulation) while maintaining or reinforcing firewalls on constitutive issues (e.g., European integration, rule of law). Moreover, the centre-right strategically (re)defines red lines for party acceptability, determining which far-right parties qualify as cooperation partners based on their positions on constitutive issues. We illustrate this argument empirically and demonstrate its explanatory power across the resulting four configurations, with evidence from the European Parliament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2026.2706559
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexible firewalls: selective cooperation and strategic demarcation between centre-right and far-right parties in the EU

Ulrich Sedelmeier, Michael Blauberger
Journal of European Public Policy
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Flexible firewalls: selective cooperation and strategic demarcation between centre-right and far-right parties in the EU

Ulrich Sedelmeier, Michael Blauberger
article en

Abstract

The success of far-right parties across Europe has sparked debate about whether centre-right parties maintain or abandon the cordon sanitaire against the far right. Moving beyond this binary, we conceptualise centre-right strategy in European Union politics as ‘flexible firewalls’, encompassing not only selective cooperation but also strategic demarcation. We develop an original explanatory framework accounting for this variation, based on two factors: issue-type and party acceptability. Divergent vote- and policy-seeking incentives explain why centre-right parties increasingly cooperate with far-right parties on policy issues (i.e., economic and social regulation) while maintaining or reinforcing firewalls on constitutive issues (e.g., European integration, rule of law). Moreover, the centre-right strategically (re)defines red lines for party acceptability, determining which far-right parties qualify as cooperation partners based on their positions on constitutive issues. We illustrate this argument empirically and demonstrate its explanatory power across the resulting four configurations, with evidence from the European Parliament.

Journal of European Public Policy
University of Salzburg (AT), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Austrian Science Fund
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.