Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer in China: Annual data report of China Pancreas Data Center (2020–2021)

Abstract Objective: The China Pancreas Data Center (CPDC) was established in 2015 with the support of the Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association and initiated prospective data collection in 2017. This article reports contemporary real-world evidence on surgical outcomes during 2020–2021, with the objective of assessing and refining clinical practice in pancreatic cancer care in China. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment recorded in CPDC between January 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Systematic analysis of real-world data encompassing demographics, medical history, comorbidities, symptoms, perioperative assessment and management, surgical interventions, postoperative complications, pathological findings, and overall survival was performed. Results: A total of 6297 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from 65 centers across China were enrolled for analysis during 2020–2021. The median age was 64 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.2:1. Abdominal pain and jaundice were the most common symptoms. Approximately 62.6% of patients presented with pancreatic head/neck tumors, and the distribution of disease stage (I–IV) was 32.5%, 44.7%, 18.7%, and 4.1%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 30.4% of patients, with a conversion rate of 24.9%. Postoperative complication rates by Clavien–Dindo (I–V) were 52.6%, 33.2%, 12.7%, 1.0%, and 0.6%, respectively. The predominant neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG). The cohort’s in-hospital, 30-, and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6%, 1.2%, and 3.1%, respectively. And 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year postoperative overall survival rates were 75.8%, 53.3%, and 42.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical management of pancreatic cancer in China exhibited regional and center-based concentration. The adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, surgical safety metrics, and outcomes reported herein align with established benchmarks from international high-volume pancreatic centers. Establishment and promotion of nationwide benchmarks and standardized protocols for pancreatic surgery are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pancreatology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jp9.0000000000000270
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer in China: Annual data report of China Pancreas Data Center (2020–2021)

Baiyong Shen, Gang Jin, Xianjun Yu, Yupei Zhao et al.
Journal of Pancreatology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer in China: Annual data report of China Pancreas Data Center (2020–2021)

Baiyong Shen, Gang Jin, Xianjun Yu, Yupei Zhao, Wenming Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The China Pancreas Data Center (CPDC) was established in 2015 with the support of the Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association and initiated prospective data collection in 2017. This article reports contemporary real-world evidence on surgical outcomes during 2020–2021, with the objective of assessing and refining clinical practice in pancreatic cancer care in China. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment recorded in CPDC between January 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Systematic analysis of real-world data encompassing demographics, medical history, comorbidities, symptoms, perioperative assessment and management, surgical interventions, postoperative complications, pathological findings, and overall survival was performed. Results: A total of 6297 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from 65 centers across China were enrolled for analysis during 2020–2021. The median age was 64 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.2:1. Abdominal pain and jaundice were the most common symptoms. Approximately 62.6% of patients presented with pancreatic head/neck tumors, and the distribution of disease stage (I–IV) was 32.5%, 44.7%, 18.7%, and 4.1%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 30.4% of patients, with a conversion rate of 24.9%. Postoperative complication rates by Clavien–Dindo (I–V) were 52.6%, 33.2%, 12.7%, 1.0%, and 0.6%, respectively. The predominant neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG). The cohort’s in-hospital, 30-, and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6%, 1.2%, and 3.1%, respectively. And 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year postoperative overall survival rates were 75.8%, 53.3%, and 42.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical management of pancreatic cancer in China exhibited regional and center-based concentration. The adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, surgical safety metrics, and outcomes reported herein align with established benchmarks from international high-volume pancreatic centers. Establishment and promotion of nationwide benchmarks and standardized protocols for pancreatic surgery are warranted.

Journal of Pancreatology
Second Military Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Changhai Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.