How considered interests evolve in deliberation: evidence from Swiss citizens’ juries

Abstract Citizens increasingly demand involvement in policymaking, driving the rise of participatory processes like deliberative minipublics. This article introduces a novel longitudinal survey measure to determine the extent to which citizens are more considerate of others’ interests as a result of their participation in such forums. The study explores how participants’ considered interests vary across demographics and process-related factors measured throughout five Swiss minipublics (2019–2023) on different topics and validated using word-embedding techniques on their transcripts. While results show that minipublic participants considered interests different from their own, individuals belonging to less advantaged groups did not consistently show greater consideration of others’ interests. Interest inclusiveness was higher among older individuals, low-income earners and participants in minipublics linked to referendums. This article explains how and why participants in minipublics consider interests beyond their own, which is essential for designing more inclusive participatory processes that engage people from diverse backgrounds in increasingly polarized societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science Review
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773926100605
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How considered interests evolve in deliberation: evidence from Swiss citizens’ juries

Alexander Matthias Geisler
European Political Science Review
Social Media and Politics
article

How considered interests evolve in deliberation: evidence from Swiss citizens’ juries

Alexander Matthias Geisler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Citizens increasingly demand involvement in policymaking, driving the rise of participatory processes like deliberative minipublics. This article introduces a novel longitudinal survey measure to determine the extent to which citizens are more considerate of others’ interests as a result of their participation in such forums. The study explores how participants’ considered interests vary across demographics and process-related factors measured throughout five Swiss minipublics (2019–2023) on different topics and validated using word-embedding techniques on their transcripts. While results show that minipublic participants considered interests different from their own, individuals belonging to less advantaged groups did not consistently show greater consideration of others’ interests. Interest inclusiveness was higher among older individuals, low-income earners and participants in minipublics linked to referendums. This article explains how and why participants in minipublics consider interests beyond their own, which is essential for designing more inclusive participatory processes that engage people from diverse backgrounds in increasingly polarized societies.

European Political Science Review
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of St.Gallen (CH)
National Science Foundation, American Political Science Association, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How considered interests evolve in deliberation: evidence from Swiss citizens’ juries — Alexander Matthias Geisler · European Political Science Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS