Sex-Based Differences in Femoral Neck Circumference: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study

Introduction Sex-based differences in femoral neck morphology may contribute to the disparate incidence of hip fractures between males and females. While prior studies have largely relied on imaging-based measurements, direct morphometric evaluation of femoral neck circumference in cadaveric specimens remains limited. This study examined sex-based differences in femoral neck morphology using a cadaveric model, with an emphasis on circumference as a novel direct measurement parameter. Materials and methods Twenty-five embalmed skeletally mature human cadavers (13 females, 12 males) were included. A total of 47 femora were extracted and measured, excluding femora with a prosthesis or hardware. Cadaver-level mean values were calculated by averaging bilateral measurements when available. Morphometric parameters included femoral neck circumference, neck-shaft angle, and femoral neck axis length. Independent-samples Welch t-tests were used to compare sex-based differences. Paired t-tests and Pearson correlation were performed to evaluate bilateral symmetry. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g. Results Male cadavers demonstrated significantly greater mean femoral neck circumference compared to females (10.93 ± 0.64 cm vs. 9.45 ± 0.77 cm; Welch t(22.74) = 5.22, p < 0.001; Hedges' g = 2.00). No statistically significant sex-based differences were observed in neck-shaft angle (p = 0.47) or femoral neck axis length (p = 0.074). Strong bilateral symmetry was observed for femoral neck circumference (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). Conclusion Direct cadaveric measurement reveals clear sexual dimorphism in femoral neck circumference, whereas angular and linear dimensions show minimal sex-based differences. These findings suggest that circumferential cross-sectional geometry, rather than angular or linear morphology, may represent a meaningful axis of structural dimorphism in the proximal femur. Further biomechanical and imaging-based investigations incorporating femoral neck circumference are warranted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.113891
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-Based Differences in Femoral Neck Circumference: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study

Sumitra Miriyala, Owen Connell, Lorenzo Petralia, Sara Funk et al.
Cureus
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Sex-Based Differences in Femoral Neck Circumference: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study

Sumitra Miriyala, Owen Connell, Lorenzo Petralia, Sara Funk, Zackary Sabetta, Daniel Waszczuk, Michael Pollack, Steiv Shore, Sunny Patel, Kade Christensen, Ava A Thielman
article en

Abstract

Introduction Sex-based differences in femoral neck morphology may contribute to the disparate incidence of hip fractures between males and females. While prior studies have largely relied on imaging-based measurements, direct morphometric evaluation of femoral neck circumference in cadaveric specimens remains limited. This study examined sex-based differences in femoral neck morphology using a cadaveric model, with an emphasis on circumference as a novel direct measurement parameter. Materials and methods Twenty-five embalmed skeletally mature human cadavers (13 females, 12 males) were included. A total of 47 femora were extracted and measured, excluding femora with a prosthesis or hardware. Cadaver-level mean values were calculated by averaging bilateral measurements when available. Morphometric parameters included femoral neck circumference, neck-shaft angle, and femoral neck axis length. Independent-samples Welch t-tests were used to compare sex-based differences. Paired t-tests and Pearson correlation were performed to evaluate bilateral symmetry. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g. Results Male cadavers demonstrated significantly greater mean femoral neck circumference compared to females (10.93 ± 0.64 cm vs. 9.45 ± 0.77 cm; Welch t(22.74) = 5.22, p < 0.001; Hedges' g = 2.00). No statistically significant sex-based differences were observed in neck-shaft angle (p = 0.47) or femoral neck axis length (p = 0.074). Strong bilateral symmetry was observed for femoral neck circumference (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). Conclusion Direct cadaveric measurement reveals clear sexual dimorphism in femoral neck circumference, whereas angular and linear dimensions show minimal sex-based differences. These findings suggest that circumferential cross-sectional geometry, rather than angular or linear morphology, may represent a meaningful axis of structural dimorphism in the proximal femur. Further biomechanical and imaging-based investigations incorporating femoral neck circumference are warranted.

Cureus
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.