Beneath the greener shroud: disability, just transition, and the ontological politics of exclusion in EU policies

This article examines whether European Union just transition policies genuinely ‘leave no one behind’ or reproduce structural ableism through the rhetoric of inclusive green transformation. Using Carol Bacchi’s Foucauldian-inspired ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ approach, alongside disability studies, crip theory, and crip futurism, we analyse how these policies construct disability. We identify three limitations: they reduce disability to employment-related challenges, overlooking broader systemic barriers; position disabled people as policy recipients rather than knowledge producers and co-creators; and reproduce ableist assumptions about time, productivity, and progress that limit transformative potential. These discourses enact an ontological politics that shapes policy objects, subjects, effects, and the realities considered possible, thereby constraining the transformative potential of just transitions. We argue for a ‘crip transition’ paradigm that centres disabled communities as essential agents in co-creating more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2711849
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beneath the greener shroud: disability, just transition, and the ontological politics of exclusion in EU policies

Artur da Rosa Pires, Carlo Alessandro Castellanelli, Constanza Parra
Disability & Society
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Beneath the greener shroud: disability, just transition, and the ontological politics of exclusion in EU policies

Artur da Rosa Pires, Carlo Alessandro Castellanelli, Constanza Parra
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether European Union just transition policies genuinely ‘leave no one behind’ or reproduce structural ableism through the rhetoric of inclusive green transformation. Using Carol Bacchi’s Foucauldian-inspired ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ approach, alongside disability studies, crip theory, and crip futurism, we analyse how these policies construct disability. We identify three limitations: they reduce disability to employment-related challenges, overlooking broader systemic barriers; position disabled people as policy recipients rather than knowledge producers and co-creators; and reproduce ableist assumptions about time, productivity, and progress that limit transformative potential. These discourses enact an ontological politics that shapes policy objects, subjects, effects, and the realities considered possible, thereby constraining the transformative potential of just transitions. We argue for a ‘crip transition’ paradigm that centres disabled communities as essential agents in co-creating more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable futures.

Disability & Society
University of Aveiro (PT), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.