Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project phase 3: experimental protocol for coordinated constraining and evaluation of reduced-complexity models

Abstract. Reduced-Complexity Models (RCMs) are a critical tool for synthesising climate science knowledge and providing climate projections for a wide range of emissions scenarios. The Reduced-Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP) provides a framework for the coordinated evaluation and application of these models. Here, we introduce the experimental protocol for RCMIP Phase 3 (RCMIP3), which is timed to inform the upcoming seventh assessment cycle of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR7). Taking stock of lessons from previous phases, RCMIP3 builds on community climate assessment products to support a common framework to compare RCM output against historical climate benchmarks. The experimental design aims to support a comprehensive assessment of RCMs across multiple climate-relevant domains, with a particular focus on carbon cycle dynamics and climate reversibility. The protocol is designed in tandem with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 7 (CMIP7), replicating its “Assessment Fast Track” together with complementary experiments which explore wider state dependencies, sampling multiple scenario generations, long timescale response and diverse emissions-driven process representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7111-2026
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project phase 3: experimental protocol for coordinated constraining and evaluation of reduced-complexity models

Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Chris Smith, Norman Julius Steinert, Katsumasa Tanaka et al.
Geoscientific model development
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project phase 3: experimental protocol for coordinated constraining and evaluation of reduced-complexity models

Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Chris Smith, Norman Julius Steinert, Katsumasa Tanaka, Jarmo Kikstra, Camilla Mathison, Zebedee Nicholls, Marit Sandstad, Thomas Gasser, K. Weber, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, Thomas J. Aubry
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Reduced-Complexity Models (RCMs) are a critical tool for synthesising climate science knowledge and providing climate projections for a wide range of emissions scenarios. The Reduced-Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP) provides a framework for the coordinated evaluation and application of these models. Here, we introduce the experimental protocol for RCMIP Phase 3 (RCMIP3), which is timed to inform the upcoming seventh assessment cycle of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR7). Taking stock of lessons from previous phases, RCMIP3 builds on community climate assessment products to support a common framework to compare RCM output against historical climate benchmarks. The experimental design aims to support a comprehensive assessment of RCMs across multiple climate-relevant domains, with a particular focus on carbon cycle dynamics and climate reversibility. The protocol is designed in tandem with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 7 (CMIP7), replicating its “Assessment Fast Track” together with complementary experiments which explore wider state dependencies, sampling multiple scenario generations, long timescale response and diverse emissions-driven process representation.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 19(15)
Met Office (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Leeds (GB), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), The University of Melbourne (AU), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), University of Exeter (GB), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Oxford (GB), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), Climate Analytics (DE), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR)
Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, European Space Agency, European Commission, Met Office, Norges Forskningsråd, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Natural Environment Research Council, Horizon 2020
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.