The ethical reflections of DNA computing researchers and Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology

DNA computing is an interdisciplinary field working at the intersection of computer science, molecular biology and material sciences to develop novel nanobiotechnologies. In this article, I draw on interview data to critically examine the ethical reflections of sixteen researchers in the field of DNA computing, paying particular attention to their assumptions about the relationship between humans and technology. I argue that most of their ethical reflections imply an instrumentalist understanding of technology that views technologies as neutral means for human-directed ends. Consequently, most research participants see ethical questions as distant to their work and frame their concerns around the misuse of DNA computing applications by bad actors. Expanding on notable exceptions to this instrumentalist tendency in my interview data, I propose an alternative perspective derived from the philosophy of Bernard Stiegler that treats technology as historically and dynamically intertwined with human biology and the social. I suggest that his concepts of general organology and pharmacology provide a non-instrumentalist foundation that could inform more nuanced ethical reflections on DNA computing and other biotechnologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioSocieties
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-026-00396-3
Primary Topic
DNA and Biological Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethical reflections of DNA computing researchers and Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology

Stefano Daechsel
BioSocieties
DNA and Biological Computing
article

The ethical reflections of DNA computing researchers and Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology

Stefano Daechsel
article en

Abstract

DNA computing is an interdisciplinary field working at the intersection of computer science, molecular biology and material sciences to develop novel nanobiotechnologies. In this article, I draw on interview data to critically examine the ethical reflections of sixteen researchers in the field of DNA computing, paying particular attention to their assumptions about the relationship between humans and technology. I argue that most of their ethical reflections imply an instrumentalist understanding of technology that views technologies as neutral means for human-directed ends. Consequently, most research participants see ethical questions as distant to their work and frame their concerns around the misuse of DNA computing applications by bad actors. Expanding on notable exceptions to this instrumentalist tendency in my interview data, I propose an alternative perspective derived from the philosophy of Bernard Stiegler that treats technology as historically and dynamically intertwined with human biology and the social. I suggest that his concepts of general organology and pharmacology provide a non-instrumentalist foundation that could inform more nuanced ethical reflections on DNA computing and other biotechnologies.

BioSocieties
Institute of Criminology (SI)
European Commission, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
DNA and Biological Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ethical reflections of DNA computing researchers and Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology — Stefano Daechsel · BioSocieties (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS