From Choose and Hope to Evidence and Impact: Rethinking School-Based Behavioral Health Decisions

A challenge in school-based behavioral health is how evidence-based practices are selected and implemented. Decision-making within schools often prioritizes feasibility instead of research evidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of school decision-makers in selecting and implementing evidence-based behavioral health programs. The study employed an interpretivist methodology, conducting interviews with 18 school decision-makers across K-12 school and district settings in Florida (n = 8), Kansas (n = 7), and Pennsylvania (n = 3). The study also included observations of 14 school meetings across Florida (n = 2), and Kansas (n = 12). The participants in Florida and Kansas were a part of the interviews and observations. The data collected were analyzed using an iterative diagrammatical analysis, which created the STAR (Select, Trial, Assess, Revise) Model of Behavioral Health Implementation in Schools. This model is a non-linear framework that captures the phases of behavioral health support implementation in schools. The model components are discussed, including examples from school decision-makers. The findings of this study have implications such as (a) a novel methodology for examining school-based decision-making, (b) a new model to conceptualize and enact evidence-based practices, and (c) future studies to amplify the study’s findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081319
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Choose and Hope to Evidence and Impact: Rethinking School-Based Behavioral Health Decisions

Melissa Brown, Katlyn Reynolds, Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Stephen Kilgus et al.
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

From Choose and Hope to Evidence and Impact: Rethinking School-Based Behavioral Health Decisions

Melissa Brown, Katlyn Reynolds, Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Stephen Kilgus, Joseph Latimer, Krysta Salvato-Hayes, Jennifer Wolgemuth, Hannah Brady
article en

Abstract

A challenge in school-based behavioral health is how evidence-based practices are selected and implemented. Decision-making within schools often prioritizes feasibility instead of research evidence. The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of school decision-makers in selecting and implementing evidence-based behavioral health programs. The study employed an interpretivist methodology, conducting interviews with 18 school decision-makers across K-12 school and district settings in Florida (n = 8), Kansas (n = 7), and Pennsylvania (n = 3). The study also included observations of 14 school meetings across Florida (n = 2), and Kansas (n = 12). The participants in Florida and Kansas were a part of the interviews and observations. The data collected were analyzed using an iterative diagrammatical analysis, which created the STAR (Select, Trial, Assess, Revise) Model of Behavioral Health Implementation in Schools. This model is a non-linear framework that captures the phases of behavioral health support implementation in schools. The model components are discussed, including examples from school decision-makers. The findings of this study have implications such as (a) a novel methodology for examining school-based decision-making, (b) a new model to conceptualize and enact evidence-based practices, and (c) future studies to amplify the study’s findings.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(8)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of South Florida (US)
William T. Grant Foundation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.