Cross-Scale Statistical Tests of Orbital Period-Ratio Structure: Narrow-Band Excess, Satellite-System Lattice Specificity, and Host Independence

Abstract: Kepler multi-planet systems exhibit resonance excess in adjacent period ratios (Lissauer et al. 2011; Fabrycky et al. 2014) and peas-in-a-pod log-uniform architectures (Weiss et al. 2018). We analyze orbital period-ratio structure at two scales with a unified methodology. Results: (1) the narrow band [1.35, 2.0] fraction is 37.2%, 2.18x the prior 17.1% (binomial p=3e-42), dominated by non-resonant continuous density (valley 1.10x), with no independent resonance peak; (2) satellite systems (316 pairs) hit 10 low-order lattice points 59 times vs 40 expected from a random-grid-set control (1.48x, p=0.011); the Galilean 1:2:4 Laplace chain has offsets <1%; (3) resonance rate is uncorrelated with host age (496 systems, r=+0.001, p=0.99) — flat in the mature regime (0.3-18 Gyr), complementary to the early decline of Dai et al. 2024; (4) independent of [Fe/H] (240 systems, p>0.35); (5) strictly matching pairs show net positive offset +15 pp (bootstrap p=0.001, low-order dominated), consistent with tidal parking at the upper edge of resonances; (6) the narrow band is a packing projection within the Hill-stability framework (after controlling for Delta, P ratio vs mass r=+0.785, p<0.001); the r<1.2 interval contains only 0.5%; (7) the random-grid-set control reveals the apparent all-pairs lattice excess to be a peas-in-a-pod log-uniform projection (p=0.66), establishing the protocol. All numbers are verified by reproduction scripts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21768914
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Cross-Scale Statistical Tests of Orbital Period-Ratio Structure: Narrow-Band Excess, Satellite-System Lattice Specificity, and Host Independence

Chao Qin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astro and Planetary Science
preprint

Cross-Scale Statistical Tests of Orbital Period-Ratio Structure: Narrow-Band Excess, Satellite-System Lattice Specificity, and Host Independence

Chao Qin
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract: Kepler multi-planet systems exhibit resonance excess in adjacent period ratios (Lissauer et al. 2011; Fabrycky et al. 2014) and peas-in-a-pod log-uniform architectures (Weiss et al. 2018). We analyze orbital period-ratio structure at two scales with a unified methodology. Results: (1) the narrow band [1.35, 2.0] fraction is 37.2%, 2.18x the prior 17.1% (binomial p=3e-42), dominated by non-resonant continuous density (valley 1.10x), with no independent resonance peak; (2) satellite systems (316 pairs) hit 10 low-order lattice points 59 times vs 40 expected from a random-grid-set control (1.48x, p=0.011); the Galilean 1:2:4 Laplace chain has offsets <1%; (3) resonance rate is uncorrelated with host age (496 systems, r=+0.001, p=0.99) — flat in the mature regime (0.3-18 Gyr), complementary to the early decline of Dai et al. 2024; (4) independent of [Fe/H] (240 systems, p>0.35); (5) strictly matching pairs show net positive offset +15 pp (bootstrap p=0.001, low-order dominated), consistent with tidal parking at the upper edge of resonances; (6) the narrow band is a packing projection within the Hill-stability framework (after controlling for Delta, P ratio vs mass r=+0.785, p<0.001); the r<1.2 interval contains only 0.5%; (7) the random-grid-set control reveals the apparent all-pairs lattice excess to be a peas-in-a-pod log-uniform projection (p=0.66), establishing the protocol. All numbers are verified by reproduction scripts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
BH Consulting (Ireland) (IE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.