Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess factors affecting the role effectiveness of intravenous therapy specialist nurses in Beijing, China

Despite the growing workforce of intravenous therapy (IV) specialist nurses in China, substantial underutilization remains a significant challenge. The effective use of IV specialist nurses is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. However, no comprehensive instrument currently exists to assess these factors in the Chinese healthcare context systematically. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test a questionnaire to assess factors affecting the role effectiveness of IV therapy specialist nurses in China. The preliminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, semi-structured interviews, two rounds of expert consultation, and a pilot survey. The final questionnaire was administered to 670 IV therapy specialist nurses from 62 hospitals in Beijing, China, between March and April 2025. Psychometric evaluation included content validity (I-CVI, S-CVI), item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability testing (Cronbach's α, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability). The final questionnaire consisted of 17 items across two dimensions. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.969, with split-half reliability of 0.960 and test-retest reliability of 0.990. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.991. EFA extracted two factors explaining 71.047% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.643 to 0.924. CFA produced the following fit indices: χ²/df =3.856, RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR =0.0383, GFI =0.860, CFI =0.947, IFI =0.947, NFI =0.930, and RFI =0.918. The average variance extracted (AVE) values for the two factors were 0.707 and 0.724, and composite reliability (CR) values were 0.960 and 0.948. The final model showed improved fit, with most indices meeting recommended thresholds, although RMSEA remained above the recommended cut-off, suggesting that the instrument is a valid and reliable tool for assessing factors affecting the role effectiveness of IV therapy specialist nurses in Beijing, China. Further multicenter studies with larger, more diverse, and independent samples across China are needed to confirm its generalizability, and further refine the instrument for broader application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05168-9
Primary Topic
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess factors affecting the role effectiveness of intravenous therapy specialist nurses in Beijing, China

Shengxiao Nie, Hong Sun
BMC Nursing
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess factors affecting the role effectiveness of intravenous therapy specialist nurses in Beijing, China

Shengxiao Nie, Hong Sun
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing workforce of intravenous therapy (IV) specialist nurses in China, substantial underutilization remains a significant challenge. The effective use of IV specialist nurses is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. However, no comprehensive instrument currently exists to assess these factors in the Chinese healthcare context systematically. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test a questionnaire to assess factors affecting the role effectiveness of IV therapy specialist nurses in China. The preliminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, semi-structured interviews, two rounds of expert consultation, and a pilot survey. The final questionnaire was administered to 670 IV therapy specialist nurses from 62 hospitals in Beijing, China, between March and April 2025. Psychometric evaluation included content validity (I-CVI, S-CVI), item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability testing (Cronbach's α, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability). The final questionnaire consisted of 17 items across two dimensions. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.969, with split-half reliability of 0.960 and test-retest reliability of 0.990. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.991. EFA extracted two factors explaining 71.047% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.643 to 0.924. CFA produced the following fit indices: χ²/df =3.856, RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR =0.0383, GFI =0.860, CFI =0.947, IFI =0.947, NFI =0.930, and RFI =0.918. The average variance extracted (AVE) values for the two factors were 0.707 and 0.724, and composite reliability (CR) values were 0.960 and 0.948. The final model showed improved fit, with most indices meeting recommended thresholds, although RMSEA remained above the recommended cut-off, suggesting that the instrument is a valid and reliable tool for assessing factors affecting the role effectiveness of IV therapy specialist nurses in Beijing, China. Further multicenter studies with larger, more diverse, and independent samples across China are needed to confirm its generalizability, and further refine the instrument for broader application.

BMC Nursing
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Center for Clinical Laboratories (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.