Reliability of Reagent Strips in Veterinary Medicine: A Critical Evaluation of <scp>pH</scp> and Urinary Density in Dogs using Statistical Modeling

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis is a simple and essential test in veterinary practice, involving physical, chemical, and microscopic analysis of urine. Reagent strips are widely used due to their practicality; however, their reliability compared with reference laboratory methods remains a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: This study compares different brands of reagent strips for the measurement of urinary pH and urine specific gravity (USG) in dogs and to evaluate their performance in relation to reference methods. METHODS: This study evaluated the reliability of six brands of reagent strips for measuring pH and urine specific gravity in dogs, comparing them with the gold standard methods (bench pH meter and refractometer). Association between methods was evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, and agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Linear and polynomial regression models were applied to derive correction equations where appropriate. Ninety-seven canine urine samples were analyzed, collected by natural urination, and processed under refrigeration for preservation. RESULTS: ) greater than 69%, validating their use to calibrate results and improve accuracy. In contrast, urine specific gravity measurements obtained by reagent strips showed poor agreement with refractometry, characterized by wide limits of agreement and clinically relevant bias. CONCLUSIONS: The reagent strips are inadequate for reliable determination of urine specific gravity in dogs and are not recommended as a substitute for a refractometer, while showing acceptable agreement for urinary pH estimation. According to the proposal, its use is feasible in routine clinical practice, provided that the values are adjusted by the proposed correction equations, which minimize scaling errors and significantly improve the accuracy of the results, if the manufacturers' guidelines are followed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.70124
Primary Topic
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of Reagent Strips in Veterinary Medicine: A Critical Evaluation of pH and Urinary Density in Dogs using Statistical Modeling

Amanda Prudêncio Lemes, Cleber Fernando Menegasso Mansano, Beatrice Ingrid Macente, Julia M. C. Ostti et al.
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
article

Reliability of Reagent Strips in Veterinary Medicine: A Critical Evaluation of pH and Urinary Density in Dogs using Statistical Modeling

Amanda Prudêncio Lemes, Cleber Fernando Menegasso Mansano, Beatrice Ingrid Macente, Julia M. C. Ostti, Renata R. Latorre, Valentina C. Rosa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis is a simple and essential test in veterinary practice, involving physical, chemical, and microscopic analysis of urine. Reagent strips are widely used due to their practicality; however, their reliability compared with reference laboratory methods remains a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: This study compares different brands of reagent strips for the measurement of urinary pH and urine specific gravity (USG) in dogs and to evaluate their performance in relation to reference methods. METHODS: This study evaluated the reliability of six brands of reagent strips for measuring pH and urine specific gravity in dogs, comparing them with the gold standard methods (bench pH meter and refractometer). Association between methods was evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, and agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Linear and polynomial regression models were applied to derive correction equations where appropriate. Ninety-seven canine urine samples were analyzed, collected by natural urination, and processed under refrigeration for preservation. RESULTS: ) greater than 69%, validating their use to calibrate results and improve accuracy. In contrast, urine specific gravity measurements obtained by reagent strips showed poor agreement with refractometry, characterized by wide limits of agreement and clinically relevant bias. CONCLUSIONS: The reagent strips are inadequate for reliable determination of urine specific gravity in dogs and are not recommended as a substitute for a refractometer, while showing acceptable agreement for urinary pH estimation. According to the proposal, its use is feasible in routine clinical practice, provided that the values are adjusted by the proposed correction equations, which minimize scaling errors and significantly improve the accuracy of the results, if the manufacturers' guidelines are followed.

Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Universidade Brasil (BR), Fundação de Estudo e Pesquisa em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.