Willingness to accept local CAFO development: actual water quality information and rural residents’ preferences for means of compensation

Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) provide low-cost products but often face local opposition due to environmental externalities. Based on a two-time panel discrete choice experiment (DCE) of rural residents living near CAFOs in China, this study quantifies how water quality information disclosure and various means of compensation affect residents’ acceptance of local CAFO development. The findings reveal that: (1) Compensation programmes incorporating quasi-public goods and environmental offsets can improve residents’ acceptance of CAFOs, with environmental offsets yielding the highest utility to respondents. (2) Water quality information disclosure heightens legitimate risk awareness, increasing the likelihood of opting out and rejecting CAFO construction. When the contribution of crop production to water pollution is clarified, residents receiving favourable water quality testing results show a higher willingness to accept CAFO development than those receiving unfavourable testing results. These results suggest that policymakers should prioritize environmental offsets, strengthen environmental regulation to ensure compliance, and provide the public with objective interpretations of risks. This study offers valuable insights for promoting sustainable CAFO development in China and economies with similar institutional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2709066
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Willingness to accept local CAFO development: actual water quality information and rural residents’ preferences for means of compensation

Xinqi Li, Wuyang Hu, Xinyue Liu, Li Zhou
Applied Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Willingness to accept local CAFO development: actual water quality information and rural residents’ preferences for means of compensation

Xinqi Li, Wuyang Hu, Xinyue Liu, Li Zhou
article en

Abstract

Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) provide low-cost products but often face local opposition due to environmental externalities. Based on a two-time panel discrete choice experiment (DCE) of rural residents living near CAFOs in China, this study quantifies how water quality information disclosure and various means of compensation affect residents’ acceptance of local CAFO development. The findings reveal that: (1) Compensation programmes incorporating quasi-public goods and environmental offsets can improve residents’ acceptance of CAFOs, with environmental offsets yielding the highest utility to respondents. (2) Water quality information disclosure heightens legitimate risk awareness, increasing the likelihood of opting out and rejecting CAFO construction. When the contribution of crop production to water pollution is clarified, residents receiving favourable water quality testing results show a higher willingness to accept CAFO development than those receiving unfavourable testing results. These results suggest that policymakers should prioritize environmental offsets, strengthen environmental regulation to ensure compliance, and provide the public with objective interpretations of risks. This study offers valuable insights for promoting sustainable CAFO development in China and economies with similar institutional contexts.

Applied Economics
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), The Ohio State University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.