Perspectives on Placemaking: Affective Practices and the Lived Dimensions of Space

Placemaking is widely promoted as a tool for belonging and urban transformation, yet its affective dimensions remain undertheorized. This article develops a framework for placemaking as an affective practice, arguing that sense of place is best understood through the relational dynamics of affect. Drawing on Lefebvre’s spatial triad, I show how governance often privileges conceived space while overlooking lived dimensions. Distinguishing affect from emotion, I demonstrate how embodied and social interactions generate atmospheres that shape how places are governed. Building on assemblage thinking, I conceptualize placemaking as a distributed process where affect binds material, social, and institutional forces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administration & Society
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997261469540
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Placemaking: Affective Practices and the Lived Dimensions of Space

Naomi Rommens
Administration & Society
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Perspectives on Placemaking: Affective Practices and the Lived Dimensions of Space

Naomi Rommens
article en

Abstract

Placemaking is widely promoted as a tool for belonging and urban transformation, yet its affective dimensions remain undertheorized. This article develops a framework for placemaking as an affective practice, arguing that sense of place is best understood through the relational dynamics of affect. Drawing on Lefebvre’s spatial triad, I show how governance often privileges conceived space while overlooking lived dimensions. Distinguishing affect from emotion, I demonstrate how embodied and social interactions generate atmospheres that shape how places are governed. Building on assemblage thinking, I conceptualize placemaking as a distributed process where affect binds material, social, and institutional forces.

Administration & Society
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.