Assessing Linguistic and Content Characteristics of First-Grade Students’ Texts Using Generative AI

The present study examines how accurately a common large language model (ChatGPT 5.0) assesses linguistic and content characteristics of texts written by first-grade students. The focus is on the consistency of LLM assessments and their alignment with human assessments. The database consists of N = 539 texts written by elementary school students. The results show that, contrary to our expectations, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics are not generally more consistent than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Furthermore, alignment between LLM and human assessments is higher for the assessment of single linguistic characteristics (such as the use of cohesive devices) than for the assessment of single content characteristics (such as originality), but not in general. Thus, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics in early elementary school are not generally more accurate than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for using LLMs as assessment tools in early stages of schooling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081227
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Linguistic and Content Characteristics of First-Grade Students’ Texts Using Generative AI

Daniel Then, Caroline Theurer, Sanna Pohlmann-Rother, David Cropley
Education Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Assessing Linguistic and Content Characteristics of First-Grade Students’ Texts Using Generative AI

Daniel Then, Caroline Theurer, Sanna Pohlmann-Rother, David Cropley
article en

Abstract

The present study examines how accurately a common large language model (ChatGPT 5.0) assesses linguistic and content characteristics of texts written by first-grade students. The focus is on the consistency of LLM assessments and their alignment with human assessments. The database consists of N = 539 texts written by elementary school students. The results show that, contrary to our expectations, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics are not generally more consistent than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Furthermore, alignment between LLM and human assessments is higher for the assessment of single linguistic characteristics (such as the use of cohesive devices) than for the assessment of single content characteristics (such as originality), but not in general. Thus, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics in early elementary school are not generally more accurate than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for using LLMs as assessment tools in early stages of schooling.

Education SciencesVol. 16(8)
University of Würzburg (DE), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.