Teachers’ reported experiences with the Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program: a process evaluation of FEAST

Healthy and sustainable food education initiatives in primary schools are gaining momentum in research and practice. OzHarvest’s Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) is one such program which aims to increase children’s fruit and vegetable intake and reduce their food waste behaviours. This study aimed to analyse teachers’ experiences with the FEAST program, including their perceptions about the program’s impact on children’s fruit and vegetable consumption and food waste behaviours. It further sought to determine if teacher perceptions are associated with school sector (government / non-government), rurality, size and socio-educational advantage (a scale of advantage calculated for each school). Primary school teachers who implemented FEAST with their students between 2021 and 2023 were invited to participate in a post-implementation teacher survey with closed- and open-ended questions. Data was collected about program reach and teacher perceptions about program effectiveness, implementation, intentions for maintenance, satisfaction and impact. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables and chi-square analyses, Kruskal-Wallis tests, t-tests and pairwise correlations were used to determine associations with school sector, rurality, size and socio-educational advantage. Responses to open-ended questions were analysed using conceptual content analysis in NVivo 15. Participants were 48 primary school teachers from 44 schools across Australia. FEAST was largely implemented as intended, though only 51.1% of teachers created a class cookbook, and this was associated with school-level socio-educational advantage. No other school characteristics were associated with any other variables measured. Teachers reported high levels of program satisfaction and considered program resources and training to be effective. Most teachers reported their students’ food waste behaviours decreased by 5–20%. Only 55.5% and 33.3% agreed their students ate more fruit and vegetables and less ‘junk’ food respectively since completing FEAST. The FEAST program is well received by primary school teachers as an effective mechanism for delivering healthy and sustainable food education. Findings from this study can support ongoing quality improvement of FEAST and other healthy and sustainable food education initiatives around the world to increase their uptake and impact on population and planetary health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28875-z
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ reported experiences with the Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program: a process evaluation of FEAST

Jessica V Kempler, Claire Margerison, Alison Booth, Amelia Berner et al.
BMC Public Health
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Teachers’ reported experiences with the Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program: a process evaluation of FEAST

Jessica V Kempler, Claire Margerison, Alison Booth, Amelia Berner, Janandani Nanayakkara
article en

Abstract

Healthy and sustainable food education initiatives in primary schools are gaining momentum in research and practice. OzHarvest’s Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) is one such program which aims to increase children’s fruit and vegetable intake and reduce their food waste behaviours. This study aimed to analyse teachers’ experiences with the FEAST program, including their perceptions about the program’s impact on children’s fruit and vegetable consumption and food waste behaviours. It further sought to determine if teacher perceptions are associated with school sector (government / non-government), rurality, size and socio-educational advantage (a scale of advantage calculated for each school). Primary school teachers who implemented FEAST with their students between 2021 and 2023 were invited to participate in a post-implementation teacher survey with closed- and open-ended questions. Data was collected about program reach and teacher perceptions about program effectiveness, implementation, intentions for maintenance, satisfaction and impact. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables and chi-square analyses, Kruskal-Wallis tests, t-tests and pairwise correlations were used to determine associations with school sector, rurality, size and socio-educational advantage. Responses to open-ended questions were analysed using conceptual content analysis in NVivo 15. Participants were 48 primary school teachers from 44 schools across Australia. FEAST was largely implemented as intended, though only 51.1% of teachers created a class cookbook, and this was associated with school-level socio-educational advantage. No other school characteristics were associated with any other variables measured. Teachers reported high levels of program satisfaction and considered program resources and training to be effective. Most teachers reported their students’ food waste behaviours decreased by 5–20%. Only 55.5% and 33.3% agreed their students ate more fruit and vegetables and less ‘junk’ food respectively since completing FEAST. The FEAST program is well received by primary school teachers as an effective mechanism for delivering healthy and sustainable food education. Findings from this study can support ongoing quality improvement of FEAST and other healthy and sustainable food education initiatives around the world to increase their uptake and impact on population and planetary health.

BMC Public Health
Deakin University (AU), GlaxoSmithKline (Australia) (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.