Methodologic Standards for Follow-Up Extension in Cardiovascular Trials: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Extension follow-up trials are essential for understanding the long-term safety and efficacy of cardiovascular interventions. Whereas primary randomized trials primarily capture short-term outcomes, extended observation may reveal delayed benefits or harms that are highly relevant to clinical decision-making. However, methodologic standards for extension trials remain poorly defined, leading to inconsistent design, analysis, and reporting. This scientific statement outlines best practices for cardiovascular trial extensions, addressing outcome selection, duration and completeness of follow-up, and analytic strategies suited to evolving treatment effects. Practical considerations, including strategies for participant retention, reconsent, data continuity, and resource allocation, are also discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001458
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodologic Standards for Follow-Up Extension in Cardiovascular Trials: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Emilie P. Belley-Côté, Marcus Flather, Frank Rockhold, Alexander C. Gregg et al.
Circulation
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Methodologic Standards for Follow-Up Extension in Cardiovascular Trials: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Emilie P. Belley-Côté, Marcus Flather, Frank Rockhold, Alexander C. Gregg, Joshua A. Beckman, Irbaz Hameed, Sigrid Sandner, Emilia Bagiella, Mario Gaudino, Stuart Pocock, Björn Redfors
article en

Abstract

Extension follow-up trials are essential for understanding the long-term safety and efficacy of cardiovascular interventions. Whereas primary randomized trials primarily capture short-term outcomes, extended observation may reveal delayed benefits or harms that are highly relevant to clinical decision-making. However, methodologic standards for extension trials remain poorly defined, leading to inconsistent design, analysis, and reporting. This scientific statement outlines best practices for cardiovascular trial extensions, addressing outcome selection, duration and completeness of follow-up, and analytic strategies suited to evolving treatment effects. Practical considerations, including strategies for participant retention, reconsent, data continuity, and resource allocation, are also discussed.

Circulation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.