An audit of professional standards for sport science

Sport is a global industry with athletes supported by sport scientists who have gained the necessary education and experience. However, there is still great variety in the training and career development opportunities for novice and trainee sport scientists to develop their practice. The objective of this study is to audit current sports science professional standards worldwide. A network approach and modified scoping review protocol were used to guide a global search of existing national professional standards for inclusion in the audit. The professional standards from the included associations were analysed together to indicate the breadth and depth of their coverage, using thematic analyses and summary statistics. Professional standards from five countries were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion in the audit. The standards from one country were selected as the basis for the standards audit. Five composite standard domains were created, with 37 related elements being included for comparison. Common elements exist across the audited sport science standards and there is inconsistent coverage of some elements. The findings are important for understanding the skill and competency expectations for sport science practice. This audit confirmed there is sufficient breadth, depth and international coverage to produce internationally representative professional standards in sport science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2713350
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An audit of professional standards for sport science

Nicholas Gant, Kade Davison, Nathan E. Reeves, Andrew Scott et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

An audit of professional standards for sport science

Nicholas Gant, Kade Davison, Nathan E. Reeves, Andrew Scott, Kate Pumpa, Tom Comyns, Hannah Connon
article en

Abstract

Sport is a global industry with athletes supported by sport scientists who have gained the necessary education and experience. However, there is still great variety in the training and career development opportunities for novice and trainee sport scientists to develop their practice. The objective of this study is to audit current sports science professional standards worldwide. A network approach and modified scoping review protocol were used to guide a global search of existing national professional standards for inclusion in the audit. The professional standards from the included associations were analysed together to indicate the breadth and depth of their coverage, using thematic analyses and summary statistics. Professional standards from five countries were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion in the audit. The standards from one country were selected as the basis for the standards audit. Five composite standard domains were created, with 37 related elements being included for comparison. Common elements exist across the audited sport science standards and there is inconsistent coverage of some elements. The findings are important for understanding the skill and competency expectations for sport science practice. This audit confirmed there is sufficient breadth, depth and international coverage to produce internationally representative professional standards in sport science.

Journal of Sports Sciences
University College Dublin (IE), Griffith University (AU), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Auckland (NZ), University of South Australia (AU), University of Limerick (IE), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.