Fertility incentives in Canada: Period and cohort perspectives

Abstract We study the fertility effects of the 1997 Quebec Family Policy using two complementary approaches: (i) a period‐based repeated cross‐sectional analysis that examines the impact on period fertility (i.e., fertility rates in a given calendar year, such as births per 1,000 women age 15 to 49), and (ii) a cohort‐based panel analysis that examines the impact on completed fertility for specific cohorts. Using aggregate vital statistics (1991–2019) and the synthetic control method, the period analysis indicates a long‐run increase in period fertility, which may reflect both shifts in the timing of childbearing and changes in completed fertility among affected cohorts. To assess completed fertility, we conduct panel analysis using a 20% sample of Canadian tax returns and a dynamic difference‐in‐differences approach. For two relatively older cohorts of women who already entered reproductive years before the reform, we find that the policy reduced completed fertility while increasing their labour supply. Taken together, the findings show that the policy raised period fertility but lowered completed fertility for certain cohorts, indicating that its effects depend on the life‐cycle stage at which women were exposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70075
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fertility incentives in Canada: Period and cohort perspectives

Sitian Liu, Siha Lee
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Fertility incentives in Canada: Period and cohort perspectives

Sitian Liu, Siha Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study the fertility effects of the 1997 Quebec Family Policy using two complementary approaches: (i) a period‐based repeated cross‐sectional analysis that examines the impact on period fertility (i.e., fertility rates in a given calendar year, such as births per 1,000 women age 15 to 49), and (ii) a cohort‐based panel analysis that examines the impact on completed fertility for specific cohorts. Using aggregate vital statistics (1991–2019) and the synthetic control method, the period analysis indicates a long‐run increase in period fertility, which may reflect both shifts in the timing of childbearing and changes in completed fertility among affected cohorts. To assess completed fertility, we conduct panel analysis using a 20% sample of Canadian tax returns and a dynamic difference‐in‐differences approach. For two relatively older cohorts of women who already entered reproductive years before the reform, we find that the policy reduced completed fertility while increasing their labour supply. Taken together, the findings show that the policy raised period fertility but lowered completed fertility for certain cohorts, indicating that its effects depend on the life‐cycle stage at which women were exposed.

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Queen's University (CA), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Arts Research Board, McMaster University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.