A defense destined to be sacred? Conflicting narratives and the contentious beginnings of Iran–Iraq war literature in Iran

The Iran–Iraq War (1980-1988) has been a major theme in Persian fiction published in Iran since 1980. Within Iran, the literature of this war is often framed as the “literature of the Sacred Defense,” in reference to the Iranian regime’s narrative of the war as a “battle between truth and falsehood.” Although this portrayal of the war has been challenged, especially since 1988, literary historians and critics generally characterize wartime literature as one dominated by Sacred Defense discourse. By contrast, this article demonstrates that the state’s capture of the literary sphere emerged through processes of incentivization and censorship that elevated one literary discourse on the war while suppressing another. It reads early examples of war literature in Iran as containing the kernels of literary counternarratives of the war and calls for a more inclusive and nuanced reading of some of the earliest published wartime literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle Eastern Literatures
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475262x.2026.2692807
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A defense destined to be sacred? Conflicting narratives and the contentious beginnings of Iran–Iraq war literature in Iran

Amir Moosavi
Middle Eastern Literatures
Islamic Studies and History
article

A defense destined to be sacred? Conflicting narratives and the contentious beginnings of Iran–Iraq war literature in Iran

Amir Moosavi
article en

Abstract

The Iran–Iraq War (1980-1988) has been a major theme in Persian fiction published in Iran since 1980. Within Iran, the literature of this war is often framed as the “literature of the Sacred Defense,” in reference to the Iranian regime’s narrative of the war as a “battle between truth and falsehood.” Although this portrayal of the war has been challenged, especially since 1988, literary historians and critics generally characterize wartime literature as one dominated by Sacred Defense discourse. By contrast, this article demonstrates that the state’s capture of the literary sphere emerged through processes of incentivization and censorship that elevated one literary discourse on the war while suppressing another. It reads early examples of war literature in Iran as containing the kernels of literary counternarratives of the war and calls for a more inclusive and nuanced reading of some of the earliest published wartime literature.

Middle Eastern Literatures
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Rütgers (Germany) (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.