Dynamic Resilience Screening of Strait of Hormuz-Induced Trade Squeeze in Global Food Supply Chain Systems

A maritime chokepoint shock can spread beyond the countries directly connected to the affected route. We develop a monthly resilience screening model for a hypothetical Strait of Hormuz closure that separates direct disruption, scarcity-driven trade squeeze, household access pressure and delayed production risk. Hormuz severity variants and related Red Sea, Black Sea and fertilizer node scenarios test the stability of the modeled mechanism ordering. A three-event historical panel provides a limited external consistency check, not full model validation. In the baseline Hormuz stress test, mean modeled import availability pressure ranges from 0.0023 to 0.0076 on the normalized scale during March–August 2026. Trade squeeze accounts for 92.1–94.5% of that pressure, compared with 5.5–7.9% for direct disruption. Of 161 countries entering model-Alert, 39 later enter model-Crisis or a higher internal state. Crossings concentrate where reallocation pressure coincides with weak household access and delayed production risk. Historical estimates are directionally consistent for some events, although the Suez window exhibits non-flat pre-event coefficients and is not interpreted causally. The state labels are internal thresholds, not humanitarian classifications. The model identifies which propagation layer is binding and how quickly the associated intervention window closes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14080938
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Resilience Screening of Strait of Hormuz-Induced Trade Squeeze in Global Food Supply Chain Systems

Feng An, Jingwen Cui, Xuyang Liu, Siyao Liu et al.
Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Dynamic Resilience Screening of Strait of Hormuz-Induced Trade Squeeze in Global Food Supply Chain Systems

Feng An, Jingwen Cui, Xuyang Liu, Siyao Liu, Shuai Ren
article en

Abstract

A maritime chokepoint shock can spread beyond the countries directly connected to the affected route. We develop a monthly resilience screening model for a hypothetical Strait of Hormuz closure that separates direct disruption, scarcity-driven trade squeeze, household access pressure and delayed production risk. Hormuz severity variants and related Red Sea, Black Sea and fertilizer node scenarios test the stability of the modeled mechanism ordering. A three-event historical panel provides a limited external consistency check, not full model validation. In the baseline Hormuz stress test, mean modeled import availability pressure ranges from 0.0023 to 0.0076 on the normalized scale during March–August 2026. Trade squeeze accounts for 92.1–94.5% of that pressure, compared with 5.5–7.9% for direct disruption. Of 161 countries entering model-Alert, 39 later enter model-Crisis or a higher internal state. Crossings concentrate where reallocation pressure coincides with weak household access and delayed production risk. Historical estimates are directionally consistent for some events, although the Suez window exhibits non-flat pre-event coefficients and is not interpreted causally. The state labels are internal thresholds, not humanitarian classifications. The model identifies which propagation layer is binding and how quickly the associated intervention window closes.

SystemsVol. 14(8)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science and Technology Major Project
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.