Institutional frameworks of public-led modular housing in Korea through chronological and process-based analysis

In Korea, MODULAR HOUSING has been promoted as an alternative to conventional on-site construction amid labor shortages, productivity constraints, and growing demand for standardized housing delivery. However, despite repeated public-sector initiatives, its diffusion has remained uneven. This study examines the development of public-led modular housing in Korea from an institutional perspective and identifies conditions influencing its implementation and diffusion. Using a qualitative research design, the study combines peer-reviewed literature, legal and policy documents, procurement guidelines, public agency reports, project-level cases, and expert consultation. The analysis clarifies the conceptual boundaries among Off-Site Construction (OSC), MODULAR CONSTRUCTION, and MODULAR HOUSING, while document analysis focuses on certification systems, procurement structures, and delivery frameworks. In addition, a chronological review of project-level cases conducted by major public housing providers is undertaken. The analysis shows that public-led modular housing in Korea has developed through multiple institutional pathways rather than a single linear process. Persistent institutional challenges are identified in certification, procurement, performance verification, and standardization, as well as ongoing ambiguity in the conceptual boundaries between OSC and modular systems. The study concludes by outlining directions for institutional improvement and further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2026.2702694
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional frameworks of public-led modular housing in Korea through chronological and process-based analysis

Hae-Yeon Yoo, Junyoung Kim, Jung-Kyu Yoon, Sae-Hyoung Yun
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Institutional frameworks of public-led modular housing in Korea through chronological and process-based analysis

Hae-Yeon Yoo, Junyoung Kim, Jung-Kyu Yoon, Sae-Hyoung Yun
article en

Abstract

In Korea, MODULAR HOUSING has been promoted as an alternative to conventional on-site construction amid labor shortages, productivity constraints, and growing demand for standardized housing delivery. However, despite repeated public-sector initiatives, its diffusion has remained uneven. This study examines the development of public-led modular housing in Korea from an institutional perspective and identifies conditions influencing its implementation and diffusion. Using a qualitative research design, the study combines peer-reviewed literature, legal and policy documents, procurement guidelines, public agency reports, project-level cases, and expert consultation. The analysis clarifies the conceptual boundaries among Off-Site Construction (OSC), MODULAR CONSTRUCTION, and MODULAR HOUSING, while document analysis focuses on certification systems, procurement structures, and delivery frameworks. In addition, a chronological review of project-level cases conducted by major public housing providers is undertaken. The analysis shows that public-led modular housing in Korea has developed through multiple institutional pathways rather than a single linear process. Persistent institutional challenges are identified in certification, procurement, performance verification, and standardization, as well as ongoing ambiguity in the conceptual boundaries between OSC and modular systems. The study concludes by outlining directions for institutional improvement and further research.

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (US), Soongsil University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.