Hospice Care in the Era of <scp>AI</scp> : Hospices' Views on Data‐Driven Tools to Support Live Discharge Decisions

BACKGROUND: Live discharge occurs for 20% of hospice enrollees, resulting in loss of support and disruptive care transitions, with higher risk for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Little is understood about how data-driven clinical decision support tools (e.g., predictive algorithms) might support decision making regarding live discharge. As hospices adopt value-based care, identifying opportunities and challenges for data-driven tools to predict and support live discharge holds great potential to support hospice patients and their caregivers. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 hospice leaders in clinical care, quality, and data science at seven non-profit United States hospices. Four-step rapid analysis and deductive approaches were used to summarize interview content in response to research questions and identify cross-organizational themes. RESULTS: Participants identified multilevel-individual and family, organizational, community, and system-challenges and facilitators to support patients following live discharge. Families dealing with ADRD face a heavier care burden but also access ADRD-specific programs. Participants expressed strong interest in using predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk for live discharge and either support them to remain in hospice or facilitate robust discharge planning. Participants emphasized the importance of tool specification and clinical workflow integration to make predictive tools useful and impactful. CONCLUSIONS: Hospices face barriers to support hospice patients and caregivers experiencing burden and suboptimal outcomes following live discharge. Predictive modeling could be a potentially powerful tool to facilitate support for patients discharged alive, provided they are accurately specified and thoughtfully integrated into clinical workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70621
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hospice Care in the Era of AI : Hospices' Views on Data‐Driven Tools to Support Live Discharge Decisions

Susan Hurley, Elizabeth A. Luth, Yongkang Zhang, Kira G Sheldon et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Hospice Care in the Era of AI : Hospices' Views on Data‐Driven Tools to Support Live Discharge Decisions

Susan Hurley, Elizabeth A. Luth, Yongkang Zhang, Kira G Sheldon, P Brennan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Live discharge occurs for 20% of hospice enrollees, resulting in loss of support and disruptive care transitions, with higher risk for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Little is understood about how data-driven clinical decision support tools (e.g., predictive algorithms) might support decision making regarding live discharge. As hospices adopt value-based care, identifying opportunities and challenges for data-driven tools to predict and support live discharge holds great potential to support hospice patients and their caregivers. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 hospice leaders in clinical care, quality, and data science at seven non-profit United States hospices. Four-step rapid analysis and deductive approaches were used to summarize interview content in response to research questions and identify cross-organizational themes. RESULTS: Participants identified multilevel-individual and family, organizational, community, and system-challenges and facilitators to support patients following live discharge. Families dealing with ADRD face a heavier care burden but also access ADRD-specific programs. Participants expressed strong interest in using predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk for live discharge and either support them to remain in hospice or facilitate robust discharge planning. Participants emphasized the importance of tool specification and clinical workflow integration to make predictive tools useful and impactful. CONCLUSIONS: Hospices face barriers to support hospice patients and caregivers experiencing burden and suboptimal outcomes following live discharge. Predictive modeling could be a potentially powerful tool to facilitate support for patients discharged alive, provided they are accurately specified and thoughtfully integrated into clinical workflows.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Cornell University (US), Cardiac Dimensions (United States) (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), New York University (US)
National Institute on Aging
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.