Implicit and Explicit Conspiracy Associations Toward LGBT People Among Cis-Heterosexual and LGBT Participants

Conspiracy beliefs targeting LGBT people have gained attention in recent years, yet research on these beliefs remains limited and relies exclusively on explicit measures that are vulnerable to social desirability biases. Across three studies (Ntot = 565), we introduce the first implicit measure of such beliefs by assessing automatic associations between “LGBT people” and conspiracy-related concepts using the standard Implicit Association Test (IAT) or a variant (ST-IAT) among cis-heterosexual and LGBT participants. Cis-heterosexual participants implicitly associated “LGBT people” with conspiracy, but not at the explicit level. These associations were stronger among men and correlated with negative attitudes and greater endorsement of LGBT-related conspiracy theories. In contrast, LGBT participants associated conspiracy with “heterosexual people” at both implicit and explicit levels. These findings shed light on implicit conspiracy associations, how they can differ from explicit ones and across dominant and minority groups, providing theoretical insights for research and practical implications for behavior and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2026.2695664
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit and Explicit Conspiracy Associations Toward LGBT People Among Cis-Heterosexual and LGBT Participants

Filomena Leonela Sbordone, Marco Salvati, Maddalena Marini
Journal of Homosexuality
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Implicit and Explicit Conspiracy Associations Toward LGBT People Among Cis-Heterosexual and LGBT Participants

Filomena Leonela Sbordone, Marco Salvati, Maddalena Marini
article en

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs targeting LGBT people have gained attention in recent years, yet research on these beliefs remains limited and relies exclusively on explicit measures that are vulnerable to social desirability biases. Across three studies (Ntot = 565), we introduce the first implicit measure of such beliefs by assessing automatic associations between “LGBT people” and conspiracy-related concepts using the standard Implicit Association Test (IAT) or a variant (ST-IAT) among cis-heterosexual and LGBT participants. Cis-heterosexual participants implicitly associated “LGBT people” with conspiracy, but not at the explicit level. These associations were stronger among men and correlated with negative attitudes and greater endorsement of LGBT-related conspiracy theories. In contrast, LGBT participants associated conspiracy with “heterosexual people” at both implicit and explicit levels. These findings shed light on implicit conspiracy associations, how they can differ from explicit ones and across dominant and minority groups, providing theoretical insights for research and practical implications for behavior and interventions.

Journal of Homosexuality
University of Verona (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.