NeuroType original self-reflection instruments: open methodology records

Open methodology records for the five original self-reflection tools published by NeuroType at https://neurotype.app. Covers 5 instruments, 34 domains and 136 items. Each record documents the construct, the provenance, the domain structure with item counts, the response scale, the scoring procedure, the interpretation bands and the stated limitations. These are not validated clinical instruments. No psychometric validation has been carried out: no factor analysis, no reliability or validity coefficients, no normative sample and no clinical comparison group. They cannot diagnose, confirm or rule out any condition. This deposit documents their design so that it can be inspected, cited and criticised. It does not constitute or imply validation. Item wordings are not included in this deposit. Construct, structure, scoring and interpretation are. Three of the five tools exist in original wording because a published instrument was not available on terms the site could meet. A RAADS-R licence was sought and declined on cost, and the ASRS carries a World Health Organization copyright requiring permission that has not been granted. No score from these tools is comparable to a published scale, and each record states so.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21780690
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NeuroType original self-reflection instruments: open methodology records

NeuroType
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

NeuroType original self-reflection instruments: open methodology records

NeuroType
article en

Abstract

Open methodology records for the five original self-reflection tools published by NeuroType at https://neurotype.app. Covers 5 instruments, 34 domains and 136 items. Each record documents the construct, the provenance, the domain structure with item counts, the response scale, the scoring procedure, the interpretation bands and the stated limitations. These are not validated clinical instruments. No psychometric validation has been carried out: no factor analysis, no reliability or validity coefficients, no normative sample and no clinical comparison group. They cannot diagnose, confirm or rule out any condition. This deposit documents their design so that it can be inspected, cited and criticised. It does not constitute or imply validation. Item wordings are not included in this deposit. Construct, structure, scoring and interpretation are. Three of the five tools exist in original wording because a published instrument was not available on terms the site could meet. A RAADS-R licence was sought and declined on cost, and the ASRS carries a World Health Organization copyright requiring permission that has not been granted. No score from these tools is comparable to a published scale, and each record states so.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.