Fibre-reinforced clayey soil stabilisation: Mechanical performance, ductility and multi-criteria sustainability ranking of natural, waste-derived and synthetic reinforcements

Soil–fibre composites are emerging as sustainable composite materials, now recognised as a viable, sustainable and cost-effective approach to improve the geotechnical behaviour of problematic and weak soils. The present work investigates the engineering response of a clayey soil (CL) reinforced with four different fibre types (human hair, coir, jute and polypropylene) at two levels of reinforcement (0.5% and 1.0% by dry weight of the soil). The Standard Proctor Compaction Test, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Test, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test and an empirical determination of Resilient Modulus (Mr) were conducted on each sample in triplicate and the data analysed by two-way ANOVA. Fibre inclusion resulted in significant improvements in strength, ductility and load-carrying capacity. UCS gains ranged from 25% to 75% and CBR gains from 43% to 128%, depending on fibre type and dosage, relative to the unreinforced control. Polypropylene fibres provided the best mechanical performance, but natural fibres – specifically coir and human hair – achieved similar mechanical strength with significantly better sustainability and cost profiles. Within the tested range, 1.0% was the most effective dosage; dosages above 1.0% were not evaluated in this study. Fibre inclusion caused a slight reduction in Maximum Dry Density (MDD) and a slight increase in Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), both within field-acceptable limits. Human hair (OI = 0.85) and coir (OI = 0.86) emerged as the most balanced choices when a weighted Optimization Index (OI) integrating quantified mechanical, cost and embodied-carbon criteria was applied. Fibre-reinforced stabilization is presented as a lower-embodied-carbon alternative to cement stabilization, based on published material carbon factors, offering lower material cost and greater post-peak ductility. The results indicate the potential of natural and waste fibres in subgrades and embankments, subject to further validation through direct cyclic-triaxial and long-term durability testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102999
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fibre-reinforced clayey soil stabilisation: Mechanical performance, ductility and multi-criteria sustainability ranking of natural, waste-derived and synthetic reinforcements

Anhar Yousuf, Utkarsh, Rakesh Kumar
Next Materials
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Fibre-reinforced clayey soil stabilisation: Mechanical performance, ductility and multi-criteria sustainability ranking of natural, waste-derived and synthetic reinforcements

Anhar Yousuf, Utkarsh, Rakesh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Soil–fibre composites are emerging as sustainable composite materials, now recognised as a viable, sustainable and cost-effective approach to improve the geotechnical behaviour of problematic and weak soils. The present work investigates the engineering response of a clayey soil (CL) reinforced with four different fibre types (human hair, coir, jute and polypropylene) at two levels of reinforcement (0.5% and 1.0% by dry weight of the soil). The Standard Proctor Compaction Test, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Test, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test and an empirical determination of Resilient Modulus (Mr) were conducted on each sample in triplicate and the data analysed by two-way ANOVA. Fibre inclusion resulted in significant improvements in strength, ductility and load-carrying capacity. UCS gains ranged from 25% to 75% and CBR gains from 43% to 128%, depending on fibre type and dosage, relative to the unreinforced control. Polypropylene fibres provided the best mechanical performance, but natural fibres – specifically coir and human hair – achieved similar mechanical strength with significantly better sustainability and cost profiles. Within the tested range, 1.0% was the most effective dosage; dosages above 1.0% were not evaluated in this study. Fibre inclusion caused a slight reduction in Maximum Dry Density (MDD) and a slight increase in Optimum Moisture Content (OMC), both within field-acceptable limits. Human hair (OI = 0.85) and coir (OI = 0.86) emerged as the most balanced choices when a weighted Optimization Index (OI) integrating quantified mechanical, cost and embodied-carbon criteria was applied. Fibre-reinforced stabilization is presented as a lower-embodied-carbon alternative to cement stabilization, based on published material carbon factors, offering lower material cost and greater post-peak ductility. The results indicate the potential of natural and waste fibres in subgrades and embankments, subject to further validation through direct cyclic-triaxial and long-term durability testing.

Next MaterialsVol. 13
Sharda University (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.