Continuous and cumulative trauma, trauma appraisals, and depersonalisation-derealisation in individuals exposed to armed conflict

Background Depersonalisation-derealisation (DPDR) is associated with trauma, but the relationship between conflict-related adverse experiences and DPDR remains unclear. The present study examined armed conflict-related trauma exposures, adverse childhood experiences, trauma-related comorbid psychopathology, and trauma appraisals as predictors of DPDR. Methods Analyses were conducted on data from 562 Colombian adults exposed to armed conflict across three waves, over 18 months. Three generalised linear mixed modelling frameworks were used: a two-step hurdle, including (i) a logistic model after recoding DPDR as binary, and (ii) a positive-part Gamma mixed model on non-zero DPDR scores; (iii) a Tweedie model. Predictors were entered sequentially as: Trauma exposure, adverse childhood experiences, DPDR-specific covariates, and trauma appraisals. Results Across all models, armed conflict-related trauma exposure variables and adverse childhood experiences were not independently associated with DPDR, while non-DPDR dissociative experiences showed significant and positive associations with DPDR. Trauma appraisals did not predict DPDR presence or severity. Conclusions This was the first study to investigate DPDR in adults exposed to continuous and cumulative trauma related to armed conflict. Findings suggest that, in this population, DPDR was associated with broader dissociative experiences but not with cumulative trauma exposure or trauma appraisals, with important implications for theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1907332
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Continuous and cumulative trauma, trauma appraisals, and depersonalisation-derealisation in individuals exposed to armed conflict

Donncha Hanna, Chérie Armour, Emanuele Fino, Martin Robinson
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Continuous and cumulative trauma, trauma appraisals, and depersonalisation-derealisation in individuals exposed to armed conflict

Donncha Hanna, Chérie Armour, Emanuele Fino, Martin Robinson
article en

Abstract

Background Depersonalisation-derealisation (DPDR) is associated with trauma, but the relationship between conflict-related adverse experiences and DPDR remains unclear. The present study examined armed conflict-related trauma exposures, adverse childhood experiences, trauma-related comorbid psychopathology, and trauma appraisals as predictors of DPDR. Methods Analyses were conducted on data from 562 Colombian adults exposed to armed conflict across three waves, over 18 months. Three generalised linear mixed modelling frameworks were used: a two-step hurdle, including (i) a logistic model after recoding DPDR as binary, and (ii) a positive-part Gamma mixed model on non-zero DPDR scores; (iii) a Tweedie model. Predictors were entered sequentially as: Trauma exposure, adverse childhood experiences, DPDR-specific covariates, and trauma appraisals. Results Across all models, armed conflict-related trauma exposure variables and adverse childhood experiences were not independently associated with DPDR, while non-DPDR dissociative experiences showed significant and positive associations with DPDR. Trauma appraisals did not predict DPDR presence or severity. Conclusions This was the first study to investigate DPDR in adults exposed to continuous and cumulative trauma related to armed conflict. Findings suggest that, in this population, DPDR was associated with broader dissociative experiences but not with cumulative trauma exposure or trauma appraisals, with important implications for theory and practice.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon