Transposed-letter effects as a function of the location of transpositions

We examined how Transposed-Letter effects (TL effects: e.g., ASBENT, derived from ABSENT, compared to the substituted-letter [SL] control ALPENT) might vary as a function of the location of the TL effects relative to fixation. The positions of the TL and the initial fixation location (either at position 2 or 5 in 6-letter stimuli) were manipulated in a lexical decision task. Initial fixation remained centered on the screen while stimuli were shifted left or right. Six-letter stimuli were presented in lowercase (Experiment 1) or uppercase (Experiment 2), with critical stimuli being nonwords created by transposing consonants at positions 2–3 or 4–5 and compared with substituted-letter controls. Results showed stronger TL effects when the transpositions occurred farther from fixation. Implications of our findings for current models of letter-position coding are discussed, by emphasizing the important connection between letter visibility (vision) and orthographic processing (reading).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visual Cognition
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2026.2716146
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transposed-letter effects as a function of the location of transpositions

Jonathan Mirault, Stéphanie Massol, Jonathan Grainger, Manuel Perea
Visual Cognition
Language Development and Disorders
article

Transposed-letter effects as a function of the location of transpositions

Jonathan Mirault, Stéphanie Massol, Jonathan Grainger, Manuel Perea
article en

Abstract

We examined how Transposed-Letter effects (TL effects: e.g., ASBENT, derived from ABSENT, compared to the substituted-letter [SL] control ALPENT) might vary as a function of the location of the TL effects relative to fixation. The positions of the TL and the initial fixation location (either at position 2 or 5 in 6-letter stimuli) were manipulated in a lexical decision task. Initial fixation remained centered on the screen while stimuli were shifted left or right. Six-letter stimuli were presented in lowercase (Experiment 1) or uppercase (Experiment 2), with critical stimuli being nonwords created by transposing consonants at positions 2–3 or 4–5 and compared with substituted-letter controls. Results showed stronger TL effects when the transpositions occurred farther from fixation. Implications of our findings for current models of letter-position coding are discussed, by emphasizing the important connection between letter visibility (vision) and orthographic processing (reading).

Visual Cognition
Universitat de València (ES), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Universidad Nebrija (ES), Institut d'Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.