Intersectional fairness in vision-language models for medical image disease classification

Medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly multimodal vision-language models (VLM), often exhibit intersectional biases, with models systematically less confident in diagnosing marginalised patient subgroups and producing higher rates of missed diagnoses. Current fairness interventions frequently fail to address these gaps or compromise overall diagnostic performance to achieve statistical parity. In this study, we developed Cross-Modal Alignment Consistency (CMAC-MMD), a training framework that standardises diagnostic certainty across intersectional patient subgroups without requiring sensitive demographic data during clinical inference. We evaluated this approach using 10,015 skin lesion images (HAM10000) with external validation on 12,000 images (BCN20000), and 10,000 fundus images for glaucoma detection (Harvard-FairVLMed), stratifying performance by intersectional age, gender, and race attributes. In the dermatology cohort, the proposed method reduced the overall intersectional missed diagnosis gap (difference in True Positive Rate, ΔTPR) from 0.50 to 0.26 while improving the Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0.94 to 0.97 compared to standard training. Similarly, for glaucoma screening, the method reduced ΔTPR from 0.41 to 0.31, achieving a better AUC of 0.72 (vs. 0.71 baseline). This provides a methodological foundation toward clinical decision support systems that are both accurate and perform more equitably across diverse patient subgroups, without increasing privacy risks during inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03030-5
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional fairness in vision-language models for medical image disease classification

Yupeng Zhang, Usman Naseem, Adam G. Dunn, Jinman Kim
npj Digital Medicine
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
article

Intersectional fairness in vision-language models for medical image disease classification

Yupeng Zhang, Usman Naseem, Adam G. Dunn, Jinman Kim
article en

Abstract

Medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly multimodal vision-language models (VLM), often exhibit intersectional biases, with models systematically less confident in diagnosing marginalised patient subgroups and producing higher rates of missed diagnoses. Current fairness interventions frequently fail to address these gaps or compromise overall diagnostic performance to achieve statistical parity. In this study, we developed Cross-Modal Alignment Consistency (CMAC-MMD), a training framework that standardises diagnostic certainty across intersectional patient subgroups without requiring sensitive demographic data during clinical inference. We evaluated this approach using 10,015 skin lesion images (HAM10000) with external validation on 12,000 images (BCN20000), and 10,000 fundus images for glaucoma detection (Harvard-FairVLMed), stratifying performance by intersectional age, gender, and race attributes. In the dermatology cohort, the proposed method reduced the overall intersectional missed diagnosis gap (difference in True Positive Rate, ΔTPR) from 0.50 to 0.26 while improving the Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0.94 to 0.97 compared to standard training. Similarly, for glaucoma screening, the method reduced ΔTPR from 0.41 to 0.31, achieving a better AUC of 0.72 (vs. 0.71 baseline). This provides a methodological foundation toward clinical decision support systems that are both accurate and perform more equitably across diverse patient subgroups, without increasing privacy risks during inference.

npj Digital Medicine
The University of Sydney (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.