Development and validation of a theoretical test for ultrasound-guided biopsy competence in the head and neck

PURPOSE: This prospective study is designed to test the validity of a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test in assessing theoretical knowledge of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biosy and core-needle biopsy of the head and neck. METHODS: Seven international experts reached consensus on the MCQ test using a modified Delphi process. After consensus, the MCQ was tested on novices (n=59) and experienced specialists (n=17). Item analysis was performed to evaluate difficulty and discriminatory ability, Cronbach's α was calculated to assess internal consistency reliability, and group differences were compared using ANOVA and t-tests. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was applied to set a pass/fail standard and thereafter, participants in a head and neck ultrasound course (n=27) took the test to assess the consequences. RESULTS: Two Delphi rounds yielded a 23-item MCQ test that reflected essential knowledge for ultrasound-guided biopsies. Two poorly performing items were removed following item analysis, resulting in a 21-item test with good reliability, Cronbach's α=0.82. Experienced clinicians scored significantly higher (mean 20.0±0.9) than both course participants (17.3±2.8) and novices (13.5±3.6, p<0.001). A pass/fail score of 18/21 (≈86%) was established as the cut-off. At this standard, 100% of experts passed the test while only 13.6% of novices and 63% of course participants achieved a passing score. CONCLUSION: An MCQ test of theoretical knowledge for ultrasound-guided head and neck biopsies was developed with evidence of validity across all five sources in Messick's framework. The test demonstrated strong content validity through expert consensus, good internal structure, significant discrimination between experience levels, and a defensible pass/fail standard. At present, the instrument should be interpreted as a theoretical knowledge assessment that may complement, but not replace, practical skills-based assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10502-7
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a theoretical test for ultrasound-guided biopsy competence in the head and neck

Lars Konge, Gitta Madani, Tsung‐Lin Yang, Merry Sebelik et al.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Development and validation of a theoretical test for ultrasound-guided biopsy competence in the head and neck

Lars Konge, Gitta Madani, Tsung‐Lin Yang, Merry Sebelik, Jacob Melchiors, Tina Klitmøller Agander, Kasper Daugaard Larsen, Leila J. Mady, Julian Kuenzel, Tobias Todsen, Jacob P. S. Nielsen, Andrew McQueen, Lisa A. Orloff
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective study is designed to test the validity of a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test in assessing theoretical knowledge of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biosy and core-needle biopsy of the head and neck. METHODS: Seven international experts reached consensus on the MCQ test using a modified Delphi process. After consensus, the MCQ was tested on novices (n=59) and experienced specialists (n=17). Item analysis was performed to evaluate difficulty and discriminatory ability, Cronbach's α was calculated to assess internal consistency reliability, and group differences were compared using ANOVA and t-tests. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was applied to set a pass/fail standard and thereafter, participants in a head and neck ultrasound course (n=27) took the test to assess the consequences. RESULTS: Two Delphi rounds yielded a 23-item MCQ test that reflected essential knowledge for ultrasound-guided biopsies. Two poorly performing items were removed following item analysis, resulting in a 21-item test with good reliability, Cronbach's α=0.82. Experienced clinicians scored significantly higher (mean 20.0±0.9) than both course participants (17.3±2.8) and novices (13.5±3.6, p<0.001). A pass/fail score of 18/21 (≈86%) was established as the cut-off. At this standard, 100% of experts passed the test while only 13.6% of novices and 63% of course participants achieved a passing score. CONCLUSION: An MCQ test of theoretical knowledge for ultrasound-guided head and neck biopsies was developed with evidence of validity across all five sources in Messick's framework. The test demonstrated strong content validity through expert consensus, good internal structure, significant discrimination between experience levels, and a defensible pass/fail standard. At present, the instrument should be interpreted as a theoretical knowledge assessment that may complement, but not replace, practical skills-based assessment.

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
University of Copenhagen (DK), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Rigshospitalet (DK), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (DK), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Capital Region of Denmark (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK), Stanford University (US)
Novo Nordisk
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.