Researcher-Curated knowledge governance for trustworthy scientific AI in the geosciences: the rockGPT approach

Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in scientific research, yet their use raises important challenges related to transparency, provenance, reproducibility, and scientific knowledge governance. In the geosciences, where conclusions often depend on integrating multidisciplinary evidence, ensuring that AI-generated responses can be traced to verifiable scientific literature is particularly important. This paper presents and evaluates a methodology for trustworthy scientific knowledge management that places researcher-curated knowledge governance at its core. The approach is based on four complementary principles: researcher-curated knowledge, retrieval-based grounding, traceability and provenance, and institutional governance. The methodology was implemented through RockGPT, a self-hosted geoscience-oriented AI system combining open-source LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and a curated corpus of scientific publications on Italian seismotectonics and the Central Apennines. The system integrates Ollama, OpenWebUI, and six open-source LLM families (Qwen, LLaMA, DeepSeek, Mixtral, Gemma, and Phi). Evaluation combined a comparative quantitative assessment with a qualitative governance-oriented analysis. Across all evaluated models, access to the researcher-curated corpus consistently improved response quality, with the largest gains observed in tasks requiring synthesis across multiple documents. Beyond these quantitative improvements, the qualitative analysis showed that the proposed approach supports key requirements for scientific AI, including transparency, provenance, reproducibility, data sovereignty, and human oversight. The results indicate that reliable scientific AI depends not only on model capabilities but also on how scientific knowledge is selected, curated, governed, and connected to generated responses. The proposed methodology demonstrates how researcher-curated knowledge governance can provide a foundation for transparent, reproducible, and institutionally controlled AI systems for scientific knowledge management in the geosciences and beyond

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Science Informatics
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-026-02197-5
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researcher-Curated knowledge governance for trustworthy scientific AI in the geosciences: the rockGPT approach

Fabrizio Bernardi, Daniele Bailo, Valentino Lauciani, Raffaele Di Stefano
Earth Science Informatics
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Researcher-Curated knowledge governance for trustworthy scientific AI in the geosciences: the rockGPT approach

Fabrizio Bernardi, Daniele Bailo, Valentino Lauciani, Raffaele Di Stefano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in scientific research, yet their use raises important challenges related to transparency, provenance, reproducibility, and scientific knowledge governance. In the geosciences, where conclusions often depend on integrating multidisciplinary evidence, ensuring that AI-generated responses can be traced to verifiable scientific literature is particularly important. This paper presents and evaluates a methodology for trustworthy scientific knowledge management that places researcher-curated knowledge governance at its core. The approach is based on four complementary principles: researcher-curated knowledge, retrieval-based grounding, traceability and provenance, and institutional governance. The methodology was implemented through RockGPT, a self-hosted geoscience-oriented AI system combining open-source LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and a curated corpus of scientific publications on Italian seismotectonics and the Central Apennines. The system integrates Ollama, OpenWebUI, and six open-source LLM families (Qwen, LLaMA, DeepSeek, Mixtral, Gemma, and Phi). Evaluation combined a comparative quantitative assessment with a qualitative governance-oriented analysis. Across all evaluated models, access to the researcher-curated corpus consistently improved response quality, with the largest gains observed in tasks requiring synthesis across multiple documents. Beyond these quantitative improvements, the qualitative analysis showed that the proposed approach supports key requirements for scientific AI, including transparency, provenance, reproducibility, data sovereignty, and human oversight. The results indicate that reliable scientific AI depends not only on model capabilities but also on how scientific knowledge is selected, curated, governed, and connected to generated responses. The proposed methodology demonstrates how researcher-curated knowledge governance can provide a foundation for transparent, reproducible, and institutionally controlled AI systems for scientific knowledge management in the geosciences and beyond

Earth Science InformaticsVol. 19(9)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.