Physiological and Subjective Assessment of Fighter Pilot Mental Workload

INTRODUCTION: Next-generation air force operations increasingly depend on advanced flight systems, which raises questions about their impact on aircrew workload. Physiological measures enable continuous, objective, and unobtrusive assessments, overcoming some limitations of self-report measures. We investigated whether electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and electrodermal activity predicted subjective Rating Scale of Mental Effort (RSME) ratings of fighter pilots during an operationally relevant mission in an F-16 simulator. METHODS: The mission included three flight segments expected to induce increasingly higher workload, with a mathematical task of two arithmetic difficulty levels added to each segment. This approach allowed us to explore whether physiology distinguished workload both across and within flight segments. RESULTS: Subjective ratings confirmed an increase in workload throughout the mission (ΔRSME = 22). However, our manipulation of arithmetic difficulty was less effective: neither subjective ratings nor arithmetic performance significantly differentiated simple and complex calculations (ΔRSME = 5; Δreaction time = 0.02 s, Δunsuccessful trials = 0.5). None of our physiological measures-frontal theta power (Δ0.08, Δ-0.07 mV), parietal alpha power (Δ-0.16, Δ0.14 mV), heart rate (Δ0.01, Δ-0.02 bpm), skin conductance response (Δ0.0, Δ0.0 mS), and skin conductance peaks (Δ0.3, Δ0.2)-systematically distinguished flight segments or arithmetic difficulty, respectively. Physiology also did not significantly predict subjective workload (R2 = 2.2%). DISCUSSION: Large interindividual variability, use of workload management strategies, and relatively small task demand differences may explain the null results. Our study underscores the complexity of workload assessment in an operational setting and offers methodological insights that may inform future ecologically valid research. Reuten AJC, Bruin J, Ledegang WD, Groen EL, Houben MMJ, Cornelisse E-J, Bottenheft C. Physiological and subjective assessment of fighter pilot mental workload. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):592-600.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82135/tno-1033524
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological and Subjective Assessment of Fighter Pilot Mental Workload

Eric L. Groen, Erik-Jan Cornelisse, Wietse D. Ledegang, Charelle Bottenheft et al.
PubMed
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Physiological and Subjective Assessment of Fighter Pilot Mental Workload

Eric L. Groen, Erik-Jan Cornelisse, Wietse D. Ledegang, Charelle Bottenheft, Anna J C Reuten, Mark M J Houben, Juliette Bruin
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Next-generation air force operations increasingly depend on advanced flight systems, which raises questions about their impact on aircrew workload. Physiological measures enable continuous, objective, and unobtrusive assessments, overcoming some limitations of self-report measures. We investigated whether electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and electrodermal activity predicted subjective Rating Scale of Mental Effort (RSME) ratings of fighter pilots during an operationally relevant mission in an F-16 simulator. METHODS: The mission included three flight segments expected to induce increasingly higher workload, with a mathematical task of two arithmetic difficulty levels added to each segment. This approach allowed us to explore whether physiology distinguished workload both across and within flight segments. RESULTS: Subjective ratings confirmed an increase in workload throughout the mission (ΔRSME = 22). However, our manipulation of arithmetic difficulty was less effective: neither subjective ratings nor arithmetic performance significantly differentiated simple and complex calculations (ΔRSME = 5; Δreaction time = 0.02 s, Δunsuccessful trials = 0.5). None of our physiological measures-frontal theta power (Δ0.08, Δ-0.07 mV), parietal alpha power (Δ-0.16, Δ0.14 mV), heart rate (Δ0.01, Δ-0.02 bpm), skin conductance response (Δ0.0, Δ0.0 mS), and skin conductance peaks (Δ0.3, Δ0.2)-systematically distinguished flight segments or arithmetic difficulty, respectively. Physiology also did not significantly predict subjective workload (R2 = 2.2%). DISCUSSION: Large interindividual variability, use of workload management strategies, and relatively small task demand differences may explain the null results. Our study underscores the complexity of workload assessment in an operational setting and offers methodological insights that may inform future ecologically valid research. Reuten AJC, Bruin J, Ledegang WD, Groen EL, Houben MMJ, Cornelisse E-J, Bottenheft C. Physiological and subjective assessment of fighter pilot mental workload. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):592-600.

PubMedVol. 97(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.