A novel ultrasound-based vein visualization technology can better detect optimal peripheral veins when compared to landmark

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure prior to therapy completion is a major issue. Technology to identify more suitable veins for cannulation is essential to improve successful insertion and reduce post-insertion complications and avoidable costs. Objective: The experimental study was designed to compare vessel selection for cannulation when using a novel ultrasound-based vein visualization prototype versus traditional landmark technique. Methods: Three clinicians competent in cannulation (CCC) used landmark technique to select and mark a vein indicated for short peripheral catheter (SPC) placement on each arm of the 12 patients recruited (24 arms). This process was repeated using the vein visualization prototype. A blinded Vascular Access Specialist (VAS) evaluated each marked site using ultrasound (GE Logiq S7). Vessel cannulation suitability was rated on a 5-point Likert (⩾3 considered suitable). Ethics approval was obtained (SMHS HREC RGS0000006930). Results: Landmark-selected veins were deemed suitable less often (52.2% vs 78.3%; p = 0.08) than prototype-selected veins and had lower average suitability scores (2.57 vs 3.22; p = 0.03). Landmark technique selected veins from various sites: hand (4.3%), wrist (17.4%), mid-forearm (73.9%), and antecubital fossa (4.3%), whereas the prototype predominantly selected mid-forearm veins (95.7%). Landmark-selected veins were significantly shallower (1.83 mm vs 2.61 mm; p = 0.03) than prototype-selected veins, however the diameter of these veins were not significantly different between the two techniques (2.20 mm vs 2.72 mm; p = 0.05). Both techniques detected veins with 95.8% sensitivity. Conclusion: The prototype outperformed the landmark technique by visualizing non-palpable, non-visible vessels. The veins identified were larger and optimally located in the mid-forearm, both attributes linked to fewer complications and improved first-time insertion success. Future prototype refinement will include ergonomic improvements and clinical data to enhance performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Vascular Access
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298261469954
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel ultrasound-based vein visualization technology can better detect optimal peripheral veins when compared to landmark

Phuoc Hao Ho, Nikhilesh Bappoo, Peter J. Carr, Barry J. Doyle et al.
The Journal of Vascular Access
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

A novel ultrasound-based vein visualization technology can better detect optimal peripheral veins when compared to landmark

Phuoc Hao Ho, Nikhilesh Bappoo, Peter J. Carr, Barry J. Doyle, Gavin Jackson, Michael D. Liddelow, Ellaby L. Hansen, Kate C Molan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure prior to therapy completion is a major issue. Technology to identify more suitable veins for cannulation is essential to improve successful insertion and reduce post-insertion complications and avoidable costs. Objective: The experimental study was designed to compare vessel selection for cannulation when using a novel ultrasound-based vein visualization prototype versus traditional landmark technique. Methods: Three clinicians competent in cannulation (CCC) used landmark technique to select and mark a vein indicated for short peripheral catheter (SPC) placement on each arm of the 12 patients recruited (24 arms). This process was repeated using the vein visualization prototype. A blinded Vascular Access Specialist (VAS) evaluated each marked site using ultrasound (GE Logiq S7). Vessel cannulation suitability was rated on a 5-point Likert (⩾3 considered suitable). Ethics approval was obtained (SMHS HREC RGS0000006930). Results: Landmark-selected veins were deemed suitable less often (52.2% vs 78.3%; p = 0.08) than prototype-selected veins and had lower average suitability scores (2.57 vs 3.22; p = 0.03). Landmark technique selected veins from various sites: hand (4.3%), wrist (17.4%), mid-forearm (73.9%), and antecubital fossa (4.3%), whereas the prototype predominantly selected mid-forearm veins (95.7%). Landmark-selected veins were significantly shallower (1.83 mm vs 2.61 mm; p = 0.03) than prototype-selected veins, however the diameter of these veins were not significantly different between the two techniques (2.20 mm vs 2.72 mm; p = 0.05). Both techniques detected veins with 95.8% sensitivity. Conclusion: The prototype outperformed the landmark technique by visualizing non-palpable, non-visible vessels. The veins identified were larger and optimally located in the mid-forearm, both attributes linked to fewer complications and improved first-time insertion success. Future prototype refinement will include ergonomic improvements and clinical data to enhance performance.

The Journal of Vascular Access
Griffith University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research (AU), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), International University College Of Technology (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.