Evaluating the Readability of Patient‐Facing Online Educational Materials for Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Together, leukemia and lymphoma account for 38.7% of newly diagnosed pediatric cancer cases in the United States each year. Many caregivers utilize online resources to inform medical health decisions. Understanding the readability of these materials is critical to ensuring comprehensible patient education. We sought to evaluate if the readability of online patient-facing educational materials concerning pediatric leukemia and lymphoma met the recommended sixth-grade reading level by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA). METHODS: The websites of the 72 National Cancer Institute (NCI) accredited cancer centers were accessed and the presence of a pediatric-specific informational page regarding leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma were recorded and analyzed using Flesch-Kinkaid, Coleman-Liau, and SMOG readability indices. The top 50 internet search results for pediatric leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma were also analyzed. RESULTS: The average readability across disorders for the NCI-accredited Cancer Centers ranged from 8.62 to 10.20. A total of 95.6% of the Cancer Center materials did not meet the NIH and AMA guidelines. The average readability across disorders for the top 50 searches ranged from 10.52 to 11.01. A total of 98% of the search materials did not meet the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The materials currently available online may be too complex for the average individual to understand, providing a potential barrier to making informed healthcare decisions. Correcting the readability of online materials, including those that are physician-recommended, is crucial to ensuring comprehensive patient education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1545-5017.70602
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Readability of Patient‐Facing Online Educational Materials for Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma

William Miller, Chloe Strege, Christen Ebens, Jakub Tolar et al.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Evaluating the Readability of Patient‐Facing Online Educational Materials for Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma

William Miller, Chloe Strege, Christen Ebens, Jakub Tolar, Simone Intriago Tito, Courtney Popp, Cindy Eide
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Together, leukemia and lymphoma account for 38.7% of newly diagnosed pediatric cancer cases in the United States each year. Many caregivers utilize online resources to inform medical health decisions. Understanding the readability of these materials is critical to ensuring comprehensible patient education. We sought to evaluate if the readability of online patient-facing educational materials concerning pediatric leukemia and lymphoma met the recommended sixth-grade reading level by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA). METHODS: The websites of the 72 National Cancer Institute (NCI) accredited cancer centers were accessed and the presence of a pediatric-specific informational page regarding leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma were recorded and analyzed using Flesch-Kinkaid, Coleman-Liau, and SMOG readability indices. The top 50 internet search results for pediatric leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma were also analyzed. RESULTS: The average readability across disorders for the NCI-accredited Cancer Centers ranged from 8.62 to 10.20. A total of 95.6% of the Cancer Center materials did not meet the NIH and AMA guidelines. The average readability across disorders for the top 50 searches ranged from 10.52 to 11.01. A total of 98% of the search materials did not meet the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The materials currently available online may be too complex for the average individual to understand, providing a potential barrier to making informed healthcare decisions. Correcting the readability of online materials, including those that are physician-recommended, is crucial to ensuring comprehensive patient education.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.