Treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: real-world evidence from seven countries

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), real-world data on relapsed/refractory (R/R) MZL are limited. METHODS: This retrospective panel-based chart review study examined patient characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with R/R MZL who received a second or third line (2L or 3L) of therapy between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2021 in 7 countries. Treatment patterns were summarized overall and by MZL type. RESULTS: The study included 526 patients, 513 with 2L and 13 with 3L as index treatment. The median age of 2L patients was 67.0 years. Most patients had stage III or IV disease and intermediate or high-risk prognostic scores. Around 60.0% of the patients had nodal, 22.8% had splenic, and 14.2% had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) MZL. Most patients received chemoimmunotherapy (42.8%), Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi; 25.1%), or lenalidomide and rituximab/obinutuzumab (16.3%) in 2L. Treatment patterns varied across subtypes, with notable differences in 2L BTKi use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest variability and limitations in the treatment selection for R/R MZL beyond frontline therapy, with the choice of treatment mostly limited to chemoimmunotherapy and BTKi. This study provides much-needed real-world evidence that can help guide clinical management and the development of novel therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Oncology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2026.2700479
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: real-world evidence from seven countries

Monika Raut, Patrick Squires, Craig Anthony Portell, Lynn Huynh et al.
Future Oncology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: real-world evidence from seven countries

Monika Raut, Patrick Squires, Craig Anthony Portell, Lynn Huynh, Katherine Elizabeth Ryland, Mei Sheng Duh, Maryaline Catillon, Kelvin Tamakloe, Jennifer Prescott, Steven Liu, Tracy Guo, Harshali Patel
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), real-world data on relapsed/refractory (R/R) MZL are limited. METHODS: This retrospective panel-based chart review study examined patient characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with R/R MZL who received a second or third line (2L or 3L) of therapy between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2021 in 7 countries. Treatment patterns were summarized overall and by MZL type. RESULTS: The study included 526 patients, 513 with 2L and 13 with 3L as index treatment. The median age of 2L patients was 67.0 years. Most patients had stage III or IV disease and intermediate or high-risk prognostic scores. Around 60.0% of the patients had nodal, 22.8% had splenic, and 14.2% had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) MZL. Most patients received chemoimmunotherapy (42.8%), Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi; 25.1%), or lenalidomide and rituximab/obinutuzumab (16.3%) in 2L. Treatment patterns varied across subtypes, with notable differences in 2L BTKi use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest variability and limitations in the treatment selection for R/R MZL beyond frontline therapy, with the choice of treatment mostly limited to chemoimmunotherapy and BTKi. This study provides much-needed real-world evidence that can help guide clinical management and the development of novel therapies.

Future Oncology
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), University of Virginia (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.