Motion Sensitivity Analysis and Terrain Correction for UAV‐Borne Gamma‐Ray Spectrometry

ABSTRACT Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with gamma‐ray spectrometry sensors enable high‐resolution surveys but face challenges in rugged terrain. Conventional airborne gamma‐ray processing commonly approximates the source–detector geometry using a single height‐above‐ground parameter. This approximation is often unsuitable for low‐altitude UAV surveys, where rapid topographic changes, variable flight altitude, and platform motion can influence the measured response. This study first evaluates platform motion using a moving point‐spread function sensitivity analysis to quantify footprint elongation associated with survey speed, integration time, and flight altitude. A three‐dimensional, grid‐based terrain‐response model is then developed to account for variations in source–detector distance, terrain geometry, and line‐of‐sight visibility. Controlled synthetic simulations are used to evaluate the model under known terrain and source configurations. The motion analysis shows that footprint elongation is small under typical survey conditions but increases with higher survey speed, longer integration time, and lower flight altitude. The synthetic simulations further show how terrain geometry changes the measured response and demonstrate that the terrain‐response model recovers the known source distribution. When applied to UAV radiometric data collected over a rugged porphyry copper–molybdenum deposit in Arizona, USA, terrain‐correction magnitudes reached approximately 15% in areas of pronounced topographic relief. The largest adjustments occurred on slopes, ridges, and in topographic depressions, indicating that terrain effects were the primary source of geometric variation under the conditions examined. The proposed workflow provides a practical approach for identifying and correcting geometric effects in low‐altitude UAV gamma‐ray surveys over complex terrain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70232
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motion Sensitivity Analysis and Terrain Correction for UAV‐Borne Gamma‐Ray Spectrometry

Marshall MacNabb, Neeraj Nainwal, Alexander Braun
Geophysical Prospecting
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
article

Motion Sensitivity Analysis and Terrain Correction for UAV‐Borne Gamma‐Ray Spectrometry

Marshall MacNabb, Neeraj Nainwal, Alexander Braun
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with gamma‐ray spectrometry sensors enable high‐resolution surveys but face challenges in rugged terrain. Conventional airborne gamma‐ray processing commonly approximates the source–detector geometry using a single height‐above‐ground parameter. This approximation is often unsuitable for low‐altitude UAV surveys, where rapid topographic changes, variable flight altitude, and platform motion can influence the measured response. This study first evaluates platform motion using a moving point‐spread function sensitivity analysis to quantify footprint elongation associated with survey speed, integration time, and flight altitude. A three‐dimensional, grid‐based terrain‐response model is then developed to account for variations in source–detector distance, terrain geometry, and line‐of‐sight visibility. Controlled synthetic simulations are used to evaluate the model under known terrain and source configurations. The motion analysis shows that footprint elongation is small under typical survey conditions but increases with higher survey speed, longer integration time, and lower flight altitude. The synthetic simulations further show how terrain geometry changes the measured response and demonstrate that the terrain‐response model recovers the known source distribution. When applied to UAV radiometric data collected over a rugged porphyry copper–molybdenum deposit in Arizona, USA, terrain‐correction magnitudes reached approximately 15% in areas of pronounced topographic relief. The largest adjustments occurred on slopes, ridges, and in topographic depressions, indicating that terrain effects were the primary source of geometric variation under the conditions examined. The proposed workflow provides a practical approach for identifying and correcting geometric effects in low‐altitude UAV gamma‐ray surveys over complex terrain.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 74(7)
Queen's University (CA), Vernon Jubilee Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.