Disaster Vulnerability in an Ageing Rural Society: The 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake

The 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake offers an important case for examining disaster in an ageing rural society. Existing studies have contributed substantially to understanding hazard processes and physical damage, but less attention has been given to the structure of vulnerability that shaped both disaster impacts and early recovery. This paper addresses that gap through an integrated analysis of vulnerability, culture and gender. Based on documentary analysis of official reports and peer-reviewed studies, the paper argues that the Noto disaster cannot be explained adequately by hazard impact alone. Its severity was shaped by the interaction of demographic ageing, depopulation, infrastructural fragility, care dependence, health-system constraints and place-based cultural systems. Infrastructure failure became socially consequential because it occurred in a setting marked by advanced ageing, limited redundancy and uneven access to medical care, social care and wider support. The analysis also suggests that culture functioned both as a source of vulnerability and as a possible resource in recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disaster Research
Published
2026-07-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2026.p0791
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Disaster Vulnerability in an Ageing Rural Society: The 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake

David Alexander, Miwako Kitamura
Journal of Disaster Research
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Disaster Vulnerability in an Ageing Rural Society: The 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake

David Alexander, Miwako Kitamura
article en

Abstract

The 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake offers an important case for examining disaster in an ageing rural society. Existing studies have contributed substantially to understanding hazard processes and physical damage, but less attention has been given to the structure of vulnerability that shaped both disaster impacts and early recovery. This paper addresses that gap through an integrated analysis of vulnerability, culture and gender. Based on documentary analysis of official reports and peer-reviewed studies, the paper argues that the Noto disaster cannot be explained adequately by hazard impact alone. Its severity was shaped by the interaction of demographic ageing, depopulation, infrastructural fragility, care dependence, health-system constraints and place-based cultural systems. Infrastructure failure became socially consequential because it occurred in a setting marked by advanced ageing, limited redundancy and uneven access to medical care, social care and wider support. The analysis also suggests that culture functioned both as a source of vulnerability and as a possible resource in recovery.

Journal of Disaster ResearchVol. 21(4)
Tohoku University (JP), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.