Impella‐Assisted High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock With Low‐Flow, Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Patients with cardiogenic shock, low‐flow, low‐gradient aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease who are ineligible for surgery present a major therapeutic challenge. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support may facilitate revascularization in this high‐risk population. A 69‐year‐old man presented after a mechanical fall and was found to have non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, acute decompensated heart failure, low‐gradient aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease. Echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25%–30% with mild left ventricular dilation and mildly reduced right ventricular systolic function. Laboratory testing demonstrated elevated troponin, markedly elevated B‐type natriuretic peptide, and acute kidney injury. Chest radiography revealed bilateral pleural effusions and mild atelectasis. Surgical revascularization was not pursued, as the patient was considered at prohibitive operative risk by cardiothoracic surgery. The patient developed cardiogenic shock requiring Impella 5.5 support and subsequently underwent Impella‐assisted high‐risk PCI to the left anterior descending artery. He was successfully weaned from mechanical support, renal function recovered, and guideline‐directed medical therapy was optimized. He was discharged with a wearable cardioverter‐defibrillator and planned repeat echocardiography. This case highlights the role of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in enabling high‐risk PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock, pseudo‐severe aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease when surgical options are not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Case Reports
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.73273
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impella‐Assisted High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock With Low‐Flow, Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Report

Zan Siddiqi, Waleed Shaker, Douni Roger, George Abela
Clinical Case Reports
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Impella‐Assisted High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock With Low‐Flow, Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Report

Zan Siddiqi, Waleed Shaker, Douni Roger, George Abela
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Patients with cardiogenic shock, low‐flow, low‐gradient aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease who are ineligible for surgery present a major therapeutic challenge. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support may facilitate revascularization in this high‐risk population. A 69‐year‐old man presented after a mechanical fall and was found to have non–ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, acute decompensated heart failure, low‐gradient aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease. Echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25%–30% with mild left ventricular dilation and mildly reduced right ventricular systolic function. Laboratory testing demonstrated elevated troponin, markedly elevated B‐type natriuretic peptide, and acute kidney injury. Chest radiography revealed bilateral pleural effusions and mild atelectasis. Surgical revascularization was not pursued, as the patient was considered at prohibitive operative risk by cardiothoracic surgery. The patient developed cardiogenic shock requiring Impella 5.5 support and subsequently underwent Impella‐assisted high‐risk PCI to the left anterior descending artery. He was successfully weaned from mechanical support, renal function recovered, and guideline‐directed medical therapy was optimized. He was discharged with a wearable cardioverter‐defibrillator and planned repeat echocardiography. This case highlights the role of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in enabling high‐risk PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock, pseudo‐severe aortic stenosis, and multivessel coronary artery disease when surgical options are not feasible.

Clinical Case ReportsVol. 14(8)
Sparrow Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.