The Clean Margin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Conceptual Appeal, Practical Uncertainty

Abstract Updated guidelines endorse tailoring antimicrobial treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) based on resection margins, representing a shift toward more individualized therapy. While conceptually appealing, this approach relies on a construct that remains ill-defined and inconsistently measured. Historically, infectious diseases management has emphasized source control without formal operationalization of resection margins. In DFO, the concept has evolved from descriptive assessments of residual infected bone to categorical designations of “positive” or “negative” margins, largely without prospective validation. Current recommendations are informed in part by limited trial data with uncertain ascertainment of residual infection. At the bedside, resection margin assessment varies across surgical, histopathological, and microbiological domains that are not interchangeable and often discordant, limiting reliability and complicating treatment decisions. Standardized definitions and prospective validation are needed before routine implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag467
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Clean Margin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Conceptual Appeal, Practical Uncertainty

Rupak Datta, Christopher Radcliffe, Marjorie Golden
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

The Clean Margin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Conceptual Appeal, Practical Uncertainty

Rupak Datta, Christopher Radcliffe, Marjorie Golden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Updated guidelines endorse tailoring antimicrobial treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) based on resection margins, representing a shift toward more individualized therapy. While conceptually appealing, this approach relies on a construct that remains ill-defined and inconsistently measured. Historically, infectious diseases management has emphasized source control without formal operationalization of resection margins. In DFO, the concept has evolved from descriptive assessments of residual infected bone to categorical designations of “positive” or “negative” margins, largely without prospective validation. Current recommendations are informed in part by limited trial data with uncertain ascertainment of residual infection. At the bedside, resection margin assessment varies across surgical, histopathological, and microbiological domains that are not interchangeable and often discordant, limiting reliability and complicating treatment decisions. Standardized definitions and prospective validation are needed before routine implementation.

Clinical Infectious Diseases
Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.