Detailed analysis of <scp>TRBC1</scp> distribution in T‐cell subsets and its application in T‐cell clonality assessment

Abstract Assessment of T‐cell clonality is critical for diagnosing T‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (T‐NHL). Flow cytometric T‐cell receptor (TCR)‐Vβ‐repertoire analysis is specific but technically complex, multi‐tube, and often limited in paucicellular specimens. T‐cell receptor‐beta‐constant‐region‐1 (TRBC1) has emerged as a simpler alternative, but normal distribution ranges in clinically relevant T‐cell subsets remain insufficiently characterized and data on direct comparison with TCR‐Vβ restriction is limited. We prospectively analyzed 70 blood samples from healthy donors and 58 samples (bone marrow, peripheral blood, fine‐needle aspirates, body fluids) from T‐NHL patients. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used for diagnostic immunophenotyping in T‐NHL cases and for TRBC1 assessment in T‐NHL cases and 28 immunophenotypic T‐cell subsets in healthy individuals. In T‐NHL, clonality was determined by TRBC1 restriction in aberrant T‐cell populations and, where sufficient material was available, corroborated by TCR‐Vβ repertoire analysis (IOTest Beta Mark).In healthy donors, median TRBC1‐positive fractions across T‐cell subsets ranged from 21.39% to 78.61%, with narrow 99% confidence intervals in major CD4 + and CD8 + compartments. Minor subsets occasionally showed extreme values (7%–93%) but remained polyclonal by TCR‐Vβ analysis, leading to thresholds of ≤6% or ≥94% TRBC1 positivity as indicative of clonality in our cohort. Among 57 evaluable T‐NHL cases, all CD3‐positive neoplastic populations showed monotypic TRBC1 expression, with 100% concordance with TCR‐Vβ results in 18 tested cases. TRBC1 was non‐informative on surface‐CD3‐negative T‐NHL, although cytoplasmic staining was sometimes helpful. Flow cytometric TRBC1 analysis is a rapid, cost‐effective, single‐tube method for T‐cell clonality assessment, with applicability to small T‐cell subsets such as paucicellular and measurable residual disease samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.70054
Primary Topic
Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detailed analysis of TRBC1 distribution in T‐cell subsets and its application in T‐cell clonality assessment

Gaurav Chatterjee, Prashant Tembhare, Anumeha Chaturvedi, Karishma Girase et al.
Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry
Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
article

Detailed analysis of TRBC1 distribution in T‐cell subsets and its application in T‐cell clonality assessment

Gaurav Chatterjee, Prashant Tembhare, Anumeha Chaturvedi, Karishma Girase, Sridhar Epari, Twinkle Khanka, Aswathy Anilkumar, Sweta Rajpal, Dhanalaxmi Shetty, Pratyusha Gudapati, K. Balaji, Simpy Raj, Jagruti Patil, Anant Gokarn, Bhausaheb Bagal, Tanuja Shet, Suresh Poojari, Manju Sengar, Sitaram G. Ghogale, Navin Khattry, Nilesh Deshpande, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Sumeet Gujral, Hasmukh Jain, Nikhil Patkar, Sachin Punatar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Assessment of T‐cell clonality is critical for diagnosing T‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (T‐NHL). Flow cytometric T‐cell receptor (TCR)‐Vβ‐repertoire analysis is specific but technically complex, multi‐tube, and often limited in paucicellular specimens. T‐cell receptor‐beta‐constant‐region‐1 (TRBC1) has emerged as a simpler alternative, but normal distribution ranges in clinically relevant T‐cell subsets remain insufficiently characterized and data on direct comparison with TCR‐Vβ restriction is limited. We prospectively analyzed 70 blood samples from healthy donors and 58 samples (bone marrow, peripheral blood, fine‐needle aspirates, body fluids) from T‐NHL patients. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used for diagnostic immunophenotyping in T‐NHL cases and for TRBC1 assessment in T‐NHL cases and 28 immunophenotypic T‐cell subsets in healthy individuals. In T‐NHL, clonality was determined by TRBC1 restriction in aberrant T‐cell populations and, where sufficient material was available, corroborated by TCR‐Vβ repertoire analysis (IOTest Beta Mark).In healthy donors, median TRBC1‐positive fractions across T‐cell subsets ranged from 21.39% to 78.61%, with narrow 99% confidence intervals in major CD4 + and CD8 + compartments. Minor subsets occasionally showed extreme values (7%–93%) but remained polyclonal by TCR‐Vβ analysis, leading to thresholds of ≤6% or ≥94% TRBC1 positivity as indicative of clonality in our cohort. Among 57 evaluable T‐NHL cases, all CD3‐positive neoplastic populations showed monotypic TRBC1 expression, with 100% concordance with TCR‐Vβ results in 18 tested cases. TRBC1 was non‐informative on surface‐CD3‐negative T‐NHL, although cytoplasmic staining was sometimes helpful. Flow cytometric TRBC1 analysis is a rapid, cost‐effective, single‐tube method for T‐cell clonality assessment, with applicability to small T‐cell subsets such as paucicellular and measurable residual disease samples.

Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Cancer Hospital and Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.